S.No. |
Description
|
Related Information |
70 |
M/s Jeet & Jeet Glass and Chemicals Pvt.
Ltd., v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
25/08/2020
Issue:
1. Whether the activity of bullet proof body building (in addition
fixing bullet proof windshield glass, bullet proofing of engine and fuel
tank) on the motor vehicles (2.5 Ton capacity ) of Chapter heading 87 of
the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, supplied by the customer (i.e. free
supply) having Tarpaulin cover in the cargo compartment, is classifiable
as supply of service under service classification head 9988 (ic) or 9988
(id) of the GST tariff attracting CGST and SGST of 9% + 9% / IGST of 18%
under the provisions of the GST Act/ IGST Act 2017?
2. Since the applicant has already charged IGST @ 28% by classifying the
supply as supply of goods under GST tariff for goods heading 8707,
whether the customer should claim the refund from the department or the
applicant should lodge the claim the refund, in the event of the above
classification being upheld by the AAR?
Crux: 1. The activity carried out by the applicant by making bullet
proof body building (in addition to fixing bullet proof windshield
glass, bullet proofing of engine and fuel tank) on the motor vehicles
(2.5 Ton capacity) of Chapter heading 87 of the Customs Tariff Act,
1975, supplied by the customer (i.e. free supply) having Tarpaulin cover
in the cargo compartment, is a supply of service attracting GST 18% (SGST
9% + CGST 9%).
2. The question related to refund of tax is outside the purview/scope of
this authority under Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017 hence, no ruling is
given.
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
69 |
M/s Hazari Bagh Builders Pvt.Ltd., v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
30/06/2020
Issue:
1. Whether the lease agreement between the applicant company i.e. the lessee and
RLDA is exempt from levy of GST in view of the Notification no.04/2019-CT (Rate)
dated 29.03.2019 or Notification no.12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017?
2. Whether the amount which is transferred by the applicant company as security
deposit in pursuance to the tender and lease agreement dated 08.11.2019 is
exempt under GST in view of the Notification no.04/2019-CT (Rate) dated
29.03.2019 or Notification no.12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017?
3. Whether the amount of Rs.15,86,57,105/- deposited during February, 2019 is
exempt under Notification no.04/2019-CT (Rate) dated 29.03.2019 or Notification
no.12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017?
Crux: 1.The lease agreement between the applicant company i.e. the
lessee and RLDA for a period of 99 years is not exempted from levy of
GST in view of the Notification no.04/2019-CT (Rate) dated 29.03.2019 or
Notification No.12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
2.The amount of Rs.158657105/- which is transferred by the applicant/SPV
in pursuance to the tender and lease agreement dated 08.11.2019 is not
exempted under GST in view of the Notification no.04/2019-CT (Rate)
dated 29.03.2019 or Notification no.12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
3.The amount of Rs.158657105/- deposited during February, 2019 is not
exempted from GST vide Notification no. 04/2019-Central Tax (rate) dated
29.03.2019 or Notification no.12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
68 |
M/s KSC Buildcon Private Limited, v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
14/05/2020
Issue: 1. Applicability of SAC and
classification of the work contract in either of the two codes viz. SAC
9973 – Leasing or rental services concerning machinery & equipment with
or without operator or SAC 9954 – Composite supply of Work contract
services?
2. What is the difference between operator and manpower as per GST
Provisions?
3. Whether the Special Purpose Vehicles in the such work order are
classified as “Machinery”?
Crux: The work undertaken by the applicant is a ‘Support Service to
Mining is covered under HSN 998622 and attracts GST @ 18% (CGST 9% +
SGST 9%) as provided under the Notification No. 11 /2017-Central Tax
(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (as amended).
Question 2 & 3 are beyond the scope of mandate given to this authority
as per Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017, therefore, no ruling is given.
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
67 |
M/s ARG Electricals Pvt. Ltd v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
14/05/2020
Issue: 1. Whether the contract
entered into with AWNL as per the work orders combine of supply,
erection, testing and commissioning of materials/equipments for
providing rural electricity infrastructure qualifies as a supply for
work contract under Section 2(119) of CGST Act?
2. If Yes, whether such supply, erection, testing and commissioning of
materials/equipments for providing rural electricity infrastructure made
to AWNL would be taxable at the rate of 12% in terms of serial no.
3(vi)(a) of the Notification no.11/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated
28.06.2017 as amended w. e. f. 25.01.2018?
Crux: 1. The work undertaken by the applicant as per contract
entered between the applicant and AWNL along with two Work Orders viz.
(a) Supply of materials/equipments and (b) Erection, Testing and
Commissioning of Materials/Equipments (supplied in first work order) in
building of rural electricity infrastructure is a composite supply of
works contract.
2. The work undertaken by the applicant (encompassing both work orders)
is a composite supply of works contract and is not covered under entry
no. 3(vi)(a) of the Notification no. 11/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated
28.06.2017 (as amended) as consequentially are not eligible to be taxed
at lower rate of 12% (SGST 6% + CGST 6%) and hence are liable to be
taxed @18% (CGST 9% + SGST 9%).
Order
Summary
Order uphold by AAAR
Order dated 03/09/2020
Issues:- (I) Whether the contract entered into with AVVNL as per two
work orders combine of supply, erection, testing and commissioning of
materials/ equipments for providing rural electricity infrastructure
qualifies as a supply for work contract under Section 2(119) of the CGST
Act?
(II) If yes, whether such supply, erection, testing and commissioning of
materials/equipments for providing rural electricity infrastructure made
to AVVNL would be taxable at the rate of 12% in terms of Sr. no 3 (vi)of
Notification No. 11/2017- C.T.(Rate) as amended w.e.f. 25.01.2018?
Crux:- The work undertaken by the applicant as per contract
(encompassing both work orders) is composite supply of Works Contract
and is not covered under Entry No. 3(vi) (a) of Notification No.
11/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017(as amended); as
consequentially are not eligible to be taxed at lower rate of 12%(SGST
6% + CGST 6%) and hence are liable to be taxed @ 18%(CGST 9% + SGST 9%).
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
66 |
M/s Sunil Kumar Gehlot v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
06/05/2020
Issue: Classification and
rate of GST applicable on henna powder?
Crux: Mehendi /Henna powder is covered under Chapter 33 and
will attract GST @18% (CGST 9% + SGST 9%)
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 41/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
65 |
M/s Sarda Bio Polymers Pvt. Ltd v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
06/05/2020
Issue: Classification and
rate of GST applicable on the Psyllium Husk Powder.
Crux: Psyllium Husk Powder, a preparation made from Psyllium Plant
or its parts is classifiable under HSN 12119032 and attracts GST @ 5%
(CGST 2.5% + SGST 2.5%) as provided under Notification No. 1/2017
Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (as amended)
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
64 |
M/s Gaurish Sharma (G.K. Enterprises) v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
05/03/2020
Issue: Whether in the facts and
circumstances of the case, does the activity carried out by the
applicant falls under Entry No. (iv)(a) of Notification No.
11/2017-CT(R)?
Alternatively, whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, does
the activity carried out by the Applicant falls under Entry No. (ix) of
Notification No. 11/2017- CT(R)?
Crux: (a) The activity proposed to be undertaken by the applicant
does not fall under entry no. (iv)(a) of the Notification No. 11/2017-
CT(R) dated 28.6.2017.
(b) The activity proposed to be undertaken by the applicant does not
fall under entry no. (ix) of the Notification No. 11/2017-CT(R) dated
28.6.2017.
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
63 |
M/s Clay Craft India Pvt.
Ltd. v/s J.P.Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member)
Order dated 20.02.2020
Issue: (a) Whether GST is payable under Reverse Charge Mechanism
(RCM) the salary paid to Director of the company who is paid salary as
per contract.
(b) Whether the situation would change from (a) above if the Director
also is a part time Director in other company also.
Crux: (a) The consideration paid to the Directors by the
applicant company will attract GST under reverse charge mechanism as it
is covered under entry No. 6 of Notification No. 13/2017 Central Tax
(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 issued under Section 9(3) of the CGST Act, 2017.
(b) Situation will remain same as (a) above and will attract GST under
reverse charge mechanism.
Order
Summary
Order uphold by AAAR
Order dated 02/07/2020
Issues:-(a) Whether GST is payable under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM);
the salary paid to Director of the company who is paid salary as per
employment contract, after deduction of TDS as well as PF.
(b) Whether the situation would change from (a) above if the Director
also is a part time Director in other company also.
Crux:- a. The consideration paid to the Directors by the applicant
company will attract GST under reverse charge mechanism as it is covered
under entry No. 6 of Notification No. 13/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated
28.06.2017 issued under Section 9(3) of the CGST Act, 2017.
b. Situation will remain same as (a) above and will attract GST under
reverse charge mechanism.
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 13/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
62 |
M/s Latest Development
Advisory Ltd v/s J.P.Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member)
Order dated 07.02.2020
Issue: Whether the applicant is required to pay GST on water
charges collected from the customers for supply of water under Contract
Il?
Crux: Contract-I and Contract-II appears to be directly linked
with each other as there is no case of direct supply of water by the
applicant to the individual residents of the society therefore the
applicant is required to pay GST as applicable on Contract-I.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
61 |
M/s SEVK RAM SAHU v/s J.P.Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member)
Order dated 18.12.2019
Issue: (i) Whether the entry number 10 of the Notification No.
12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is applicable to the
applicant and accordingly will the services provided by the applicant?
(ii) If the Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017
is not applicable, then what will be classification and HSN for services
provided by the applicant?
Crux: The services provided by way of pure labour contract
supplied by the applicant for the construction of flats under Pradhan
Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) is covered under Entry 10 of the Notification
No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (as amended).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
60 |
M/s Manju Devi v/s J.P.Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member)
Order dated 18.12.2019
Issue: a. Whether exemption of “Supply of Farm Labour” as
provided in Notification No. 12/2017 and Notification No. 09/2017
Integrated Tax (rate) dated 28.06.2017 is available to supplier of
manpower falling under SAC 99851?
b. Is it necessary for recipient of “Supply of Farm Labour” service to
be fully engaged in agriculture and not doing any other activity?
c. What type of documents/ evidence is required to be kept as a supplier
of manpower for availing exemption as “Supply of Farm Labour” under
Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and
Notification No. 09/2017 Integrated Tax (rate) dated 28.06.2017?
Crux: Exemption available to ‘supply of farm labour’
services falling under Chapter heading 9986 under Notification No.
12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and Notification No.
09/2017- Integrated Tax (rate) dated 28.06.2017 is not available to
supply of manpower services falling under SAC 99851.
The Question ‘b’ and ‘c’ raised by the applicant are beyond the scope of
this authority as defined under Section 97 (2) of the GST Act, 2017.
Hence no ruling is given.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
59 |
M/s JVS Foods Pvt.
Limited v/s J.P.Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member)
Order dated 29.11.2019
Issue: whether the goods FRK manufactured and sold by them will
fall under Chapter-10, Tariff item 1006 as Rice and description of goods
10061090 others (IGST Nil/ 5%, CGST Nil/2.5%, SGST Nil/2.5%)?
Crux: Fortified Rice Kernels (FRK), manufactured and supplied by
the applicant is classifiable under HSN 19049090 and attracts GST @ 18%
(SGST 9% + CGST 9%).
Order
Summary
Order uphold by AAAR
Order dated 01/04/2020
Issues:- whether the goods FRK manufactured and sold by them will
fall under Chapter-10, Tariff item 1006 as Rice and description of goods
10061090 others (IGST Nil/ 5%, CGST Nil/2.5%, SGST Nil/2.5%)?
Crux:- AAAR held that the FRK manufactured by the appellant do not
have essential character of natural rice and also does not merit
classification under Chapter 10 in terms of Chapter Note 1 (A) of the
said Chapter. It is appropriately classifiable under the sub-heading of
Chapter 19 i.e. under Chapter sub-heading 19049000.
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 02/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
58 |
M/s Crown Tours and Travels v/s J.P.Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member)
Order dated 27.11.2019
Issue: a. Whether the ‘Ancillary Services’ provided to various
tour operators falls under Chapter heading 9985 (i) (Supply of Tour
Operator Service) or 9985 (iii) (Support Services)?
b. What is the applicable tax rate for ancillary services provided to
various tour operators?
Crux: (a) The ‘Ancillary Services’ provided by the applicant to
various tour operators falls under Chapter heading 9985 (iii) (Support
Services) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated
28.06.2017 (as amended).
(b) The applicable rate of GST for ancillary services provided by the
applicant to various tour operators is 18% (SGST 9% + CGST 9%).
Order
Summary |
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
57 |
M/s Chandmal Narayandas Consortium v/s J.P.Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member)
Order dated 30.10.2019
Issue: a. What is applicable rate of GST on Entry Fees collected
for allowing entry in to Municipal Park Subhash Udhyan?
b. What is applicable rate of GST on ticket charges for Toy Train
facility provided in Municipal Park Subhash Udhyan?
c. What is applicable rate of GST on ticket charges for Pedal Boat
facility provided in Municipal Park Subhash Udhyan?
Crux: The rate of GST on fee collected for entry into Subhash
Udhyan (Municipal Park), ticket charges for Toy Train facility and
ticket charges for Pedal Boat facility provided in Subhash Udhyan is
@18% (SGST 9% +CGST 9%).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
56 |
M/s Indag Rubber Limited v/s J.P.Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member)
Order dated 22.10.2019
Issue: Whether the applicant is eligible to take input tax credit
on the goods and services supplied by M/s. Akanksha Contracts Pvt. for
carrying out the activities for setting up of MRO facility which will be
rented out?
Crux: The applicant is not eligible to claim credit of the GST
charged by vendor for supply of goods and services to it, which are used
for carrying out the activities (Civil Work and External Developmental
Works) for setting up of MRO facility
Order
Summary |
Section
16
of CGST
Section
17
of CGST |
55 |
M/s Shri Kailash Chandra, (Mali
Construction) v/s J.P.Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
31.01.2019
Issue: whether the activity of
supply, design, installation, commissioning and testing of reverse
osmosis plant is supply of goods or supply of services and what shall be
the rate of GST on it?"
Crux: The activity of supply, design, installation,
commissioning and testing of reverse osmosis plant and O &M work by the
applicant is a Works Contract of Composite Supply. This composite supply
is a mixed of goods and services and predominant supply is supply of
services. Since this supply is proposed to be undertaken for a
Government Department, hence the rate of tax applicable on given service
(as it is a works contract service) shall fall under Entry 3(iii) with
HSN Code 99544 and it should be IGST@12%(CGST@6%, SGST@6%).
Order
Summary
Order uphold by AAAR
Order dated 15/05/2019
Issues:- whether the activity of
supply, design, installation, commissioning and testing of reverse
osmosis plant is supply of goods or supply of services and what shall be
the rate of GST on it?"
Crux:- AAAR modify the Advance Ruling rendered by the Rajasthan
Authority for Advance Ruling, and held that the activities of supply,
design, installation, commissioning and testing of solar energy based
water pumping systems , whose time of supply falls after 31.12.2018, are
both supply of Goods and supply of Service in terms of entry no. 234
ibid, read with entry no. 38 ibid, with rate of GST as prescribed under
these entries. Consequently, the appeal filed by the appellant is
disposed of .
Order
Summary
|
Section
07
of CGST |
54 |
M/s The Akshaya Patra Foundation v/s J.P.
Meena And Hemant Jain. Order dated
09.01.2019
Issue: "Whether Preparation
and serving of food to children of government schools under Mid-Day meal
Program of Government and serving of food under Government sponsored
Anganwadi and the transfer of goods / capital equipments, exclusively
used for Mid-Day Meal program and Anganwadi meals program and the sale
of scrap items which was generated during Mid-Day Meal program is
covered under the scope of 'supply' as per section 7 of CGST/RGST Act,
2017.
Crux: 1. Preparation and serving of food to children of
government schools under Mid-Day meal Program of Government and serving
of food under Government sponsored Anganwadi meals program is covered
under the scope of ’supply’ as per section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
2. The transfer of goods / capital equipments, exclusively used for
Mid-Day Meal (MDM) program and Anganwadi meals program sponsored by
Government, between different kitchens of applicant which are ‘distinct
persons’ as per GST law is covered under the scope of ‘supply’ as per
section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
3. The sale of scrap items (as mentioned in statement of facts by the
applicant) which was generated during Mid-Day Meal program is an
activity of sale and thus covered under the scope of ‘supply’ as per
section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
Order
Summary
|
Section
07
of CGST |
53 |
M/s Tata Projects Limited v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
27.04.2018
Issue: (i) Whether the supply
under the contract for ‘Design, Realization, Integration and
Commissioning of 1.2m Trisonic Wind Tunnel at Vikram Sarabhai Space
Centre, ISRO, Thiruvananthapuram can be considered as supply of
equipment eligible for the concessional rate of GST under SI.No.243A of
First Schedule of Notification No.01/2017 Integrated Tax (Rate)
dtd.28-06-2018.
(ii) If the above supply is considered as works contract whether it
would be covered under Entry SI.No. 3 of Notification No.08/2017
Integrated Tax (Rate) dtd. 28-06-2017 as amended by Notification
No.24/2017 Integrated Tax (Rate) dtd.21-09-2017 attracting GST at the
rate of 12%.
Crux:(i) The supply under the contract cannot be considered as
supply of equipment eligible for concessional rate of goods and services
tax as per SI. No.243B of First Schedule of Notification No.01/2017
Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
(ii) The work of design, realization, integration and commissioning of
1.2m Trisonic Wind Tunnel as a turnkey project will fall under the
definition of works contract under Section 2 (119) of the CGST Act,
2017. The Service provided to the Central Government by way of
construction, erection, commissioning, installation, (completion,
fitting out, of a civil structure or any other original works meant
predominantly for use other than for commerce, industry, or any other
business or profession will attract 12% GST as per Sl.No.3(vi) of
Notification No.08/2017 Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 08/2017
Integrated Tax (Rate) |
52 |
Ashok Kumar Chaudhary (A.B. Enterprises) v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
05/09/2019
Issue:
What shall be rate of GST on activity of sub-contract for earthwork
in relation to construction of access controlled Nagpur-Mumbai Super
Communication Expressway (Maharashtra Samruddhi Mahamarg)
Crux: The rate of GST on the work of earthwork will be 18% (CGST 9%
+ SGST 9%).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
52 |
M/s K.M. Trans Logistic Pvt. Ltd. v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
30/08/2019
Issue:
1. Does Transportation by own vehicles on the basis of Invoice(s) and
E-way Bill without issuing the LR/GR by the Applicant Transporter will
covered under exempted supply/non GST supply.
2. Does Rule 42 of the CGST Rules 2017 will also apply in case where
there is GST and Non GST Supplies and there is a common consumption of
input and input services?
Crux: 1. The applicant is a registered GTA Service provider under
GST and is not exempted from paying GST.
2. Where the goods or services or both used by the registered person
partly for effecting taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies and
partly for effecting exempt supplies, the amount of credit shall be
restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the said
taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies as per provisions and
procedure prescribed under Section 17(2) of GST Act read with Rule 42 of
GST Rules, 2017.
Order
Summary
|
Section
17
of CGST
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Rule 42 of CGST
|
51 |
M/s K.M. Trans Logistic Pvt. Ltd. v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
09/01/2019
Issue: a. What should be the place of business to be considered for the purpose of registration' b. Since no billing is done from any other state other than Jaipur and even input services bills are billed at Jaipur thus the applicant is required to take registration at Jaipur only or at any other state' c. Whether having a vacant lands on lease for parking of trailers/trucks at various cities for operational purpose requires registration at various cities when billing, control, registered office, head office and management is centralized located at Jaipur.
Crux: a. The applicant is
providing services from his registered place of business i.e. Jaipur in
the state of Rajasthan. Therefore place of business for the purpose of
registration is Jaipur.
b. The registration under GST regime is applicable on place of supply of
goods or services or both. As per the facts, the place of supply is from
the state of Rajasthan, thus applicant is required to take registration
at Jaipur, Rajasthan only.
c. The vacant land taken on lease by the applicant for parking of
vehicles and drivers rest is outside the state of Rajasthan. The
authority for advance ruling is created under SGST/UTGST Act and thus
rulings are applicable within the particular state only, hence question
relating to registration of vacant lands taken on lease in various
states outside Rajasthan is out of purview of the authority and thus no
ruling is given on this aspect.
Order
Summary
|
Section
17
of CGST
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Rule 42 of CGST
|
50 |
Parmod Kumar Singhla v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
22/08/2019
Issue:
1. What will be the treatment of claiming of Input Tax Credit under
Section 16 of the GST Act in regard to by-product Cotton Seed Oil Cake
which is taxable at 0%?
2. Whether the provision of Apportionment Input Tax Credit u/s 17 of GST
Act will be also applicable on the by-product Cotton Seed Oil Cake?
3. What will be the treatment of claiming of Input Tax Credit on Raw
Cotton purchased from agriculturist on whom tax @ 5% is paid under
Reverse Charge Mechanism?
4. What will be the treatment of claiming of Input Tax Credit on Plastic
Bags (Bardana) which is only used for packing of the cotton seed oil
cake?
5. Whether the applicant has to reverse the Input Tax Credit for the
period of 2017-18, 2018-19 as per the Rule 42 of the CGST Rules, 2017?
Crux: 1. As per Section 17(2) of GST Act, 2017 the amount of
credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax that is
attributable to the taxable supplies including zero rated supplies. As
the Cotton Seed Oil Cake is exempt from GST, the applicant has to
reverse the amount of credit attributable to the supply of the Cotton
Seed Oil Cake as per provisions and procedure prescribed under Section
17(2) of GST Act, 2017 read with rule 42 of GST Rules, 2017.
2.The provision of Apportionment of Input Tax Credit u/s 17 of GST Act
will be applicable on the by-product Cotton Seed Oil Cake.
3.The applicant is eligible to claim Input Tax Credit on Raw Cotton
purchased from agriculturist on whom tax @ 5% is paid under Reverse
Charge Mechanism under Section 16 of GST Act, 2017, however, the amount
of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax that is
attributable to the taxable supplies including zero rated supplies as
per Section 17 (2) of GST Act,2017.
4.The input tax credit on Plastic bags (Bardana) is eligible as per
Section 16 of GST Act, 2017 but in the instant case as the applicant is
using Plastic bags (Bardana) exclusively for packing of the Cotton Seed
oil Cake which is exempt from GST therefore, the applicant have to
reverse the input tax credit on Plastic bags (Bardana) as per provisions
of Section 17 (2) of GST Act, 2017.
5.As the subject matter pertains to past-period therefore no ruling is
given on this issue under Section 95(a) of GST Act, 2017.
Order
Summary
|
Section
16
of CGST
Section
17
of CGST |
49 |
M/s Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam
Limited v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
30/07/2019
Issue:
1 Whether facilitating the execution of works requiring modification/
augmentation/ shifting/ additions to the transmission system of RVPN at the
specific request of the consumer/intending agency under Deposit Work is a
'Supply' in terms of Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017?
2.If the Deposit Work as aforesaid is a 'Supply', what shall be the value of the
supply in terms of Section 15 of the GST Act, 2017 in the event of :
a. Work executed by RVPN itself.
b. Work executed by the consumer/intending agency under supervision of RVPN.
3. What would be the applicable GST tax rate on the above supply?
Crux: 1 .Facilitating the execution of work (Deposit Work) by the
applicant to the consumer/intending agency is covered under the 'scope
of supply' in terms of section 7 of GST Act, 2017.
2.In both the cases as mentioned by the applicant, value shall be the
transaction value, that is the price actually paid or payable in terms
of Section 15 of the GST Act 2017.
3.The rate of GST shall be 18% (SGST 9% +CGST 9%).
Order
Summary
|
Section
15
of CGST
Section
7
of CGST |
48 |
M/s Sanjay Kumar Jain v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
02/07/2019
Issue: Whether the applicant is
liable to pay tax on the basis of reverse charge mechanism on the
freight paid by the applicant on transportation of Cotton seed oil cake
having HSN code 2306.
Crux: The Applicant is liable to pay GST under Reverse charge
Mechanism being Recipient of GTA Services
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 13/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
47. |
Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh
Ltd. v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
19/06/2019
Issue: Whether the applicant being
a cooperative society registered under the Rajasthan Co-operative
Societies Act, 1965, now consolidated to Rajasthan State Co-operative
Society Act, 2001 is liable to deduct tax at source (TDS) under GST from
payment made to it by vendors for providing/ procuring taxable goods and
services for making its supplies?
Crux: The applicant is not covered under the provisions of
Section 51 of GST Act, 2017 therefore not liable to deduct tax at
source.
Order
Summary
|
Section
51
of CGST |
46. |
M/S Vedant Synergy Pvt. Ltd. v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
03/06/2019
Issue:
a. What is the classification of goods and services supplied by the applicant?
b. What will be the applicable rate of GST on goods and services supplied by the
applicant?
Crux: The goods and services supplied by the applicant are
classifiable under HSN 998316 (Information technology infrastructure and
network management services) attracting GST @ 18% (SGST 9% + CGST 9%).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
45. |
Greentech Mega Food Park Pvt. Ltd v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
29/05/2019
Issue:
a. Whether the Lease Agreement between the Applicant Company i.e. the lessor and
the Lessee for a period of 99 years is a Sale of immovable property and outside
GST and is exempt from levy of GST?
b. If the present transaction of giving land on lease of 99 years is taxable
under GST, then at what rate and what HSN Code is applicable?
Crux: The Lease Agreement between the Applicant i.e. the lessor
and the Lessee for a period of 99 years is a Lease Agreement of
immovable property classifiable under HSN 9972 and attracts GST @18% (SGST
9% + CGST 9%).
Order
Summary
|
Section
7
of CGST
Schedule II of
CGST |
44. |
National Highway Authority of India
(Regional Office) v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
28/05/2019
Issue: Whether there is any 'Asset
Transfer' involved which is a supply leviable to GST in the work of
shifting & raising of transmission lines owned by RVPNL by NHAI in the
course of widening, modification & diversification of its highways after
completion of this work?
Without prejudice to the submissions, if there is an 'Asset Transfer'
which is a supply under GST, then who is liable to pay GST?
If above GST is to be paid by the Applicant, then the same will be
exempt vide Entry 4 of Notification no. 12/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017?
Crux: The asset constructed by the applicant does not fall under
the category of “goods” (as defined under GST Act, 2017), therefore no
supply is involved and accordingly GST is not leviable.
Order
Summary
|
Schedule II of
CGST
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
43. |
Vinayak Stone Crusher v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
20/05/2019
Issue: a. What is the classification of service provided in accordance with
Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 read with annexure attached
to it by the State of Rajasthan to M/s Vinayak Stone Crusher for which royalty
is being paid? Whether said service can be classified under 9973 specifically
under 997337 as Licensing services for the right to use minerals including its
exploration and evaluation or as any other service?
b. What is the rate of GST on given services provided by State of Rajasthan to
M/s Vinayak Stone Crusher for which royalty is being paid?
c. Whether services provided by State Government of Rajasthan is governed by
applicability of Notification No 13/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 under entry
number 5 and whether M/s Vinayak Stone Crusher is taxable person in this case to
discharge GST under reverse charge mechanism or whether given service is covered
by exclusion clause number (1) of entry no 5 and State Government of Rajasthan
is liable to discharge GST on same?
d. Whereas the Excess Royalty Collection Contractor (ERCC) by way of assigning
the right to collect royalty on behalf of the State Government on the mineral
dispatched by the- mining lease holders. However as per the Notification No
14/2018-CT (Rate) dated 28.07.2018 the services supplied by State Government to
ERCC for collection of Royalty became exempt whether M/s Vinayak Stone Crusher
is taxable person in this case to discharge GST under reverse charge mechanism?
Crux: a. The service provided by the State of Rajasthan to the
applicant for which royalty is being paid is classifiable under 997337.
b. The rate of GST on service provided by the State of Rajasthan to the
applicant for which royalty is being paid is 18% (SGST9% +C GST9°/0).
c. As the applicant is recipient of the services provided by the State
of Rajasthan he is liable to pay GST on reverse charge basis under entry
number 5 of the Notification No 13/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and
is not covered by exclusion clause number (1) of entry No.5 of the said
Notification.
d. The services supplied by State Government of Rajasthan to Excess
Royalty Collection Contractor (ERCC) by way of assigning the right to
collect royalty on behalf of the State Government is exempted with
certain restrictions by way of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax
(Rate) dated 28-6-2017 as amended by Notifi 14/2018-CT (Rate) dated
26.07.2018, However, the a liable to discharge GST on reverse charge
basis.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 13/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
42. |
All Rajasthan Corrugated Board and Box
Manufacturers Association v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
20/05/2019
Issue: I. What shall be the nature of service and
classification in accordance with Notification No. 11/2017- CT(R) dated 28.06.17
read with annexure attached to it in relation the following services:
a) Service provided by the applicant to the delegates.
b) Service provided by the applicant to the exhibitors.
II. In relation to the brand promotion packages offered by the applicant in the
course of the event,
a) What shall be the nature of service and classification in accordance with
Notification No. 11/ 2017-CT(R) dated 28.06.17 read with annexure attached to
it?
b) Whether the applicant is liable to pay tax on services provided to the brand
promoters or the liability to pay tax on such services falls on recipient under
reverse charge according to Notification No. 13/2017 – Central Tax (Rate)?
III. Whether Input Tax Credit is admissible for the applicant in respect of tax
paid on the following:
a) Services provided by the hotel including accommodation, food & beverages.
b) Supply of food and beverages by outside caterers
c) Services provided by event manager like pickup & drop, exhibition stall
setup, tenting, etc.
Crux: I The Service provided by the applicant to the delegates and
exhibitors is a composite supply and classifiable under Service Code
998596 having Service description “Events, exhibitions, conventions and
trade shows organizations and assistance services” as per Annexure:
Scheme of Classification of Services to Notification No. 11/
2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017(as amended from time to time).
II. The service of brand promotion packages offered by the applicant in
the course of the event is a composite supply and classifiable under
Service Code 998397 having Service description “Sponsorship services and
brand promotion services” as per Annexure: Scheme of Classification of
Services to Notification No. 11/ 2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated
28.06.2017 (as amended from time to time) .
The applicant is liable to pay GST on service of brand promotion and not
covered under reverse charge mechanism.
III. Input Tax Credit is admissible to the applicant in respect of tax
paid on the following:-
a) Services provided by the hotel including accommodation, food &
beverages.
b) Supply of food and beverages by outside caterers
c) Services provided by event manager like pickup & drop, exhibition
stall setup, tenting, etc.
Order
Summary
|
Section
16
of CGST
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 13/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
41. |
Pacific Quartz Surfaces LLP v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
08/05/2019
Issue:1. What is the
classification of Slabs of Quartz (Artificial Stone)?
2. What will be the applicable rate of GST on Quartz Slabs (Artificial
Stone)?
Crux: a. The Slabs of Quartz (Artificial Stone) is
classifiable under HSN Code 68101990.
b. The applicable rate of GST on Quartz Slabs (Artificial Stone) is 18%
(CGST 9% +SGST 9%).
Order
Summary
|
|
40. |
Rambagh Palace v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
30/04/2019
Issue:Repair Work
1. Whether GST paid on building materials, such as cement, concrete,
bricks, cement or marble or stone slabs or tiles, paint, polish and any
other building materials meant for repair of building shall be available for
ITC?
2.Whether GST paid on labour supply for carrying out repair of building
shall be available for ITC, where material and supervision is provided by
the applicant?
3.Will it make any difference if aforementioned works are carried out in a
composite manner as a works contract, where material as well as labour is
supplied by a contractor as a composite supply under works contract?
Repair Work relating to Electric Installation / Sanitary Fittings
1.Whether GST paid on electrical fittings, such as Cables, Switches, NCB,
and other electrical consumables meant for repair of existing electrical
fittings shall be available for ITC?
2.Whether GST paid on sanitary fittings, such as tiles, commode, bath tub,
wash basin, PVC pipes and other bath room sanitary fittings and consumables
meant for repair of existing sanitary fittings shall be available for ITC?
3.Whether GST paid on labour supply for carrying out repair of electrical
installation and/ or sanitary fittings shall be available for ITC, where
material and supervision is provided by the applicant?
4.Will it make any difference if aforementioned works are carried out in a
composite manner as a works contract, where material as well as labour is
supplied by a contractor as a composite supply under works contract?
Furniture & Fixture repairing work
1.Whether GST paid on wood, board, mica, tapestry, paint;"polish and other
consumables meant for repair of existing furniture & fixtures shall be
available for ITC? 2. Whether GST paid on labour supply for carrying out repair of
furniture & fixtures shall be available for ITC, where material and
supervision is provided by the applicant?3.Will it make any difference if aforementioned works are carried out in a
composite manner as a works contract for carrying out repair and maintenance
job on movable furniture & fixtures such as, Sofa, Table, Chairs, Door,
Cabinets, etc. where material as well as labour is supplied by a contractor
as a composite supply under works contract?
Crux: 1.1 ITC will not be available to the extent of capitalization of
building materials.
1.2 ITC will not be available to the extent of capitalization of GST
on labour supply.
1.3 ITC will not be available to the extent of capitalization of
building materials and service of labour supply.
2.1 ITC will not be available to the extent of capitalization of
electrical fittings.
2.2 ITC will not be available to the extent of capitalization of
sanitary fittings.
2.3 ITC will not be available to the extent of capitalization of
service of labour supply.
2.4 ITC will not be available for works contract service to the
extent of capitalization of supply of goods and services.
3.1 ITC for GST paid on supply of above mentioned goods will be
available in accordance with Section 16 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
3.2 ITC will be available for service of labour supply in accordance
with Section 16 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
3.3 ITC will be available for GST paid on composite supply of goods
(furniture & fixtures) and services (manpower supply) in accordance with
Section 16 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
3.4 ITC will be available for GST paid on purchase of new ready to
use furnitures in accordance with Section 16 of CGST/RGST
Order
Summary
|
Section
16
of CGST
Section
17
of CGST |
39 |
M/s Gitwako Farms India Pvt. Ltd. v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
16/04/2019
Issue: What is the classification
when the Frozen Chicken is sold in packaged form and it's HSN Code?
Whether frozen chicken as sold by the company is exempt under Entry No. 9 of
Notification No. 02/2017-CT(R)?
Crux: The Branded Frozen Chicken supplied in a unit container is
classifiable under HSN Code 02071200.
The Frozen Chicken supplied by the applicant is not exempted under Entry No.
9 of Notification No. 02/2017-CT(Rate) dated 28.06.2017(as amended from time to
time).
Order
Summary
Order uphold by AAAR
Order dated 02/08/2019
Issues:- Question-1 : What is the classification when Frozen chicken
is sold in packaged form and its HSN code?
Question-2 : Whether frozen chicken as sold by the company is exempt
under Entry No. 9 of the Notification No. 2/2017-C.T. (R), dated
28-6-2017?
Crux:- (a) The Branded Frozen Chicken supplied in a unit container
is classifiable under HSN Code 0207 12 00.
(b) The Frozen Chicken supplied by the applicant is not exempted under
Entry No. 9 of the Notification No. 2/2017-C.T. (Rate), dated 28-6-2017
(as amended from time to time).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 02/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
38. |
M/s Laxmi Agrotech Steel v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
16/04/2019
Issue: Whether parts of sprinkler
system sold by us like Latch Clamp, C-Clamp, Foot Batten, Riser Pipe,
Aluminum Rivet and Mini Sprinkler Rod etc. exclusively meant for use in
Sprinklers and drip irrigation system but sold in isolation as parts and
not as a complete system under the heading 8424 and the tax rate
applicable on such components/parts when sold separately and not as a
part of the sprinkler/ drip irrigation?
Crux: The metal parts manufactured and supplied by the applicant will not be
covered under Entry No. 195B of Schedule II of Notification No.01/2017 dated
28.06.2017.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Circular No. 81/55/2018-GST
|
37. |
M/s Laxmi Rubber Industries v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
16/04/2019
Issue:
Considering Note No.
1, 2, 3 of Section XVI and Note No. 2 of Chapter 84, whether based on
rules of interpretation of HS codes, the items made of vulcanized rubber
like Rubber Ring/GASKET/Seal, Rubber Foot Batten Washer and Rubber
Grommets falling under the heading 4016 are taxable as specific
rubber items having a GST rate of 18% or as components of
sprinkler/Drip irrigation system having a tax rate of 12% under heading
84249000. It is pertinent to note that these items are designed and
shaped that these can be used only in sprinkler/drip irrigation
equipment and have no other use
Crux: The goods manufactured and supplied by the applicant viz. Rubber
Ring/Gasket/Seal, Rubber Foot Batten Washer and Rubber Grommets are
classifiable under Chapter Heading 4016 and attract GST @ 18% (CGST 9% + SGST
9%).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Circular No. 81/55/2018-GST |
36. |
M/s Udyog Mandir v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
16/04/2019
Issue: Will Khadi readymade garments to be
included under the entry of Khadi fabric under chapter 50 to 55 of GST
classification?
If not, then what is the correct classification and rate of tax on Khadi
readymade garments?
Crux: Khadi readymade garments are not covered under the entry of 130A, chapter
heading 50 to 55 of Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated
28.06.2017.Khadi readymade garments will be classifiable under Chapter heading/tariff item
62, as per Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017
will attract GST as follows-:
a. If the sale value of a readymade khadi garments manufactured by the applicant
is less than Rs. 1000/- will attract GST @ 5% (SGST 2.5% + CGST 2.5%);
b. If the sale value of a readymade khadi garments manufactured by the applicant
is more than Rs. 1000/- will attract GST @ 12% (SGST 6% + CGST 6%)
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 02/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
35. |
M/s G A
Infra Private Limited v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
25/03/2019
Issue: Whether the
activity of O & M of Fluoride control project on ESCO Model and O & M
work supply of goods or supply of services and what shall be the rate of GST on
it?
Crux: The
activity of O & M of Fluoride Control Project on ESCO Model and O & M
work by the applicant is being undertaken for a Government Department. In this
activity of Composite supply of goods and services the applicability of GST
will be as under -:
Composite
supply of goods and services where supply of goods is below 25% out of total
value of supply then GST will be NIL.
Composite
supply of goods and services where supply of goods is more than 25% of the
total value of supply then GST will be @12% (SGST 6% +CGST 6%).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
34. |
M/s Wolkem Industries Limited
v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
25/03/2019
Issue:
(i) What is the
classification of service provided in accordance with Notification No.
11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 read with annexure attached to it, by
the State of Rajasthan to M/s Wolkem Industries Limited for which royalty is
being paid?
(ii) Whether said
service can be classified under 9973 specifically under 997337 as Licensing
services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation
or as any other service?
(iii) What is the
rate of GST on given services provided by the State of Rajasthan to M/s Wolkem
Industries Limited for which royalty is being paid?
Crux: The activity
undertaken by the applicant is classifiable under Heading 9973 (Leasing or
rental services, with or without operator), as mentioned in the annexure at
Serial No. 257 (Licensing services for the right to use
minerals including its exploration and evaluation) sub heading 997337 of
notification number 11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The applicant is liable
to discharge tax liability under reverse charge mechanism vide Notification No
13/2017-CT (Rate), dated 28.06.2017 (as amended from time to time) of the CGST
Act, 2017.
The activity undertaken by the applicant attracts 18% GST (9% CGST+ 9% SGST).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|
33 |
Rajasthan Rajya Sahakari Kriya
Vikrya Sangh v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
22/03/2019
Issue:
1.Whether
the applicant is liable for charging goods and service tax under the RGST Act,
2017 and CGST Act, 2017 on providing service for procurement of agricultural
produce i.e. oilseeds and pulses from farmers either itself or through Kray
Vikray Sahakari Samiti on behalf of its principal i.e. National Agriculture
CO-Operative Marketing federation of India Ltd. (NAFED).
2.Whether
the applicant is liable for charging RGST/CGST or IGST as the case may be on
its outward supplies of goods as well as services after having procured through
Krah Vikrah,Sahakari Samiti according to the purchase order of the NAFED.
3. Whether
the applicant being a Co-Operative society registered under the Rajasthan State
Co-Operative Society Act, 1953 now consolidated in the Rajasthan Co-Operative
Societies Act, 2001 is liable to deduct Tax at Source (TDS) from payment
to or credit of Krah Vikrah, Sahakari Samiti/RAJFED under Notification No.
90/2018-central tax dated 13.09.2018 for their services of procurement of
oilseeds and pulses for the applicant to be supplied by the applicant to its
principal NAFED.
4. Whether
the applicant being a Co-Operative society registered under the Rajasthan State
Co-Operative Society Act, 1953 now consolidated in the Rajasthan Co-Operative
Societies Act, 2001 is liable to deduct Tax at Source(TDS) from payment to or
credit of RAJFED under Notification No. 50/2018-Central Tax dated 13.09.2018
for their services of procurement of gunny bags, transportation, insurance and
services of surveyors for the applicant to be supplied by the applicant to it’s
principal NAFED itself.
Crux: 1. The applicant is not liable for charging goods and
service tax under the RGST Act, 2017 and CGST Act, 2017 on providing service
for procurement of agricultural produce i.e. oilseeds and pulses from farmers
either itself or through Kray Vikray Sahakari Samiti on behalf of its principal
i.e. NAFED as the same is exempted for a Commission Agent of agricultural
produce under Serial No. 54 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
dated 28.06.2017.
2.The applicant is not liable for charging RGST/CGST or
IGST on outward supply of pulses(other than branded) through Krah Vikrah,
Sahakari Samiti according to the purchase order of the NAFED as the same is
exempted under Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
The applicant is liable for charging RGST/CGST or IGST on outward supply of
Oilseeds (other than seed quality) through KrahVikrah, Sahakari Samiti
according to the purchase order of the NAFED and attracts GST @ 5% (SGST @ 2.5%
+ CGST @ 2.5%) in accordance with Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
dated 28.06.2017.
3.
As the applicant is not covered under Notification No.
50/2018- central tax dated 13.09.2018 read with Section 51 of CGST Act, 2017
and is therefore not liable to deduct Tax at Source (TDS) from payment to or
credit of KrahVikrah, Sahakari Samiti/RAJFED.
4. As the applicant is not covered under Notification No.
50/2018- Central Tax dated 13.09.2018 read with Section 51 of CGST Act, 2017
and is therefore not liable to deduct Tax at Source (TDS) from payment to or
credit of KrahVikrah, Sahakari Samiti /RAJFED for their services of procurement
of gunny bags, transportation, insurance and services of surveyors for the
applicant to be supplied by the applicant to its principal NAFED itself.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Section
51
of CGST |
32 |
M/s Tata Project Private Limited v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
29/03/2019
Issue: whether Sl.no.3(vi)(a) of
notification no. 11/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dt.28 June 2017 is
applicable on the works contract undertaken by it and determination of
liability to pay Tax
Crux: The GST rate applicable on the project undertaken by the
applicant is 18% (SGST 9% +CGST 9%)
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Section 2 of CGST |
31 |
M/s Mohan Infinity v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
15/03/2019
Issue:
Applicability of GST on
Natural Calcite Powder.
Crux: The
Natural Calcite Powder is classifiable under HSN Code 25309030 and attracts GST
@ 5% (CGST @ 2.5% and SGST @ 2.5%).
Order
Summary
|
Chapter 25 of GST Tariff Act |
30. |
Muncipal Corporation Pratapgarh v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
14/03/2019
Issue:
Whether
the TDS provisions are
applicable on the services received by the applicant.
Crux: · Pure Services will attract Nil rate of duty and
provisions of GST TDS will not be applicable.
· In Composite supply of goods and services where supply of goods is
not more than 25% of the total value of supply, will attract Nil rate of
duty and provisions of GST TDS will not be applicable.
· In Composite supply of goods and services where supply of goods is
more than 25% of the total value of supply, will attracts GST @ 12% (SGST
6% +CGST6%) if the activity fall under purview of Serial No. 3 of
Notification 11/2017 (CT-rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to
time and if not, then GST @ 18% (SGST 9% +CGST 9%) will be applicable.
Provisions of GST TDS will apply as the activity in this case is
taxable.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Section
51
of CGST |
29. |
M/s. Aravali Polyart Pvt Ltd. v/s Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
15/02/2019
Issue: a. What is the classification of service provided
in accordance with Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 read with
annexure attached to it, by the State of Rajasthan to M/s Aravali Polyart
Private Limited for which royalty is being paid? Whether said service can be
classified under 9973 specifically under 997337 as Licensing services for the
right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation or as any other
service?
b. What is the GST rate applicable on given services provided by State of
Rajasthan to M/s Aravali Polyart Private Limited for which royalty is being
paid?
Crux: The activity undertaken by the applicant is classifiable
under Heading 9973 (Leasing or rental services, with or without
operator), as mentioned in the annexure at Serial No. 257 (Licensing
services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and
evaluation) sub heading 997337 of notification number 11/2017-CT (Rate)
dated 28.06.2017. The applicant is liable to discharge tax liability
under reverse charge mechanism vide Notification No 13/2017-CT (Rate),
dated 28.06.2017 (as amended from time to time) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Order
Summary
Order uphold by AAAR
Order dated 31/05/2019
Issues:- a. What is the classification of
service provided in accordance with Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) dated
28.06.2017 read with annexure attached to it, by the State of Rajasthan to M/s
Aravali Polyart Private Limited for which royalty is being paid? Whether said
service can be classified under 9973 specifically under 997337 as Licensing
services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation
or as any other service.
b. What is the GST rate applicable on given services provided by State of
Rajasthan to M/s Aravali Polyart Private Limited for which royalty is being
paid?
Crux:- AAAR uphold the ruling ruled by AAR. Thus, the impugned
Service is covered under the revised entry No. (viii) of the
Notification No. 11/2017- Central Tax (R) dated 28.06.2017 attracting
GST @ 18 %
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 13/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
28. |
M/s. Shambhu Traders Pvt. Ltd. v/s Mr.
J.P Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
15/02/2019
Issue: 1. When the Applicant is operating under the
Margin Scheme notified under Rule 32(5) of the Central Goods and Service Tax
Rules, 2017 (“CGST Rules, 2017”) by selling the used lead acid batteries to
other manufacturers whether such used lead acid batteries qualify as ‘second
hand goods’ and thus covered under the Margin Scheme notified under Rule 32(5)
of the CGST Rules, 2017?
2. When the Applicant is selling goods under the Margin Scheme notified under
Rule 32(5) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017. The Tax on Outward
Supply under the Margin Scheme would be qualified under which of the following
heading in GSTR-3B in following cases:-
a) When Applicant selling the goods within the state?
b) When Applicant selling the goods outside the state?
3. When the Applicant is operating under the
Margin Scheme notified under Rule 32(5) of the Central Goods and Service Tax
Rules, 2017 (“CGST Rules, 2017”) by selling the used lead acid batteries to
manufacturers whether the goods when sold outside the state or when sold within
the state of Rajasthan qualifies under the Margin Scheme.
Crux:
1. The used lead acid batteries qualify to be second hand goods.
Accordingly, the Applicant dealer is entitled to operate under the
Margin Scheme in respect of the used lead acid batteries.
2. The query raised by the applicant is not specified in Section 97(2) of CGST
Act/RGST Act, 2017, therefore, no advance ruling is given.
3. The Rule 32(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 which provides for Margin Scheme in
case of intra-state supplies shall also be applicable in case of inter-state
supplies. The Applicant is entitled to make inter-state supplies of used lead
acid batteries while operating under the Margin Scheme.
Order
Summary
|
Rule 32 of CGST
Section
97
of CGST |
27. |
IMF Cognitive Technology Pvt. Ltd. v/s
Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
09/01/2019
Issue: Whether the input tax
credit of Central Tax paid in Haryana be available to the applicant who is registered in Rajasthan
State, whereby such tax is paid on inward supplies used for business of person
registered in Rajasthan?"
Crux: Input tax credit of Central Tax paid in Haryana is not available
to the applicant who is registered in state of Rajasthan.
Order
Summary
Order uphold by AAAR
Order dated 08/05/2019
Issues:- Whether the input tax
credit of Central Tax paid in Haryana be available to
the Applicant who is registered in Rajasthan State?
Crux:- AAAR uphold the ruling rendered by AAR in respect of ITC of
the Central GST paid in Haryana, which has been held as “not admissible”
to the Appellant. Thus, the Appeal filed by the appellant is not legally
sustainable and hence is liable to be dismissed .
Order
Summary
|
Section
16
of CGST |
26. |
K M Trans Logistics Private Limited v/s
Mr. J.P
Meena (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
09/01/2019
Issue:
a. What should be the place of business to be considered for the purpose of
registration?
b. Since no billing is done from any other state other than Jaipur and even
input services bills are billed at Jaipur thus the applicant is required to take
registration at Jaipur only or at any other state?
c. Whether having a vacant lands on lease for parking of trailers/trucks at
various cities for operational purpose requires registration at various cities
when billing, control, registered office, head office and management is
centralized located at Jaipur.
Crux: a. The applicant is providing services from his registered
place of business i.e. Jaipur in the state of Rajasthan. Therefore place
of business for the purpose of registration is Jaipur.
b. The registration under GST regime is applicable on place of supply of
goods or services or both. As per the facts, the place of supply is from
the state of Rajasthan, thus applicant is required to take registration
at Jaipur, Rajasthan only.
c. The vacant land taken on lease by the applicant for parking of
vehicles and drivers rest is outside the state of Rajasthan. The
authority for advance ruling is created under SGST/UTGST Act and thus
rulings are applicable within the particular state only, hence question
relating to registration of vacant lands taken on lease in various
states outside Rajasthan is out of purview of the authority and thus no
ruling is given on this aspect.
Order
Summary
Order uphold by AAAR
Order dated 20/11/2019
Issues:- (i) Does Transportation by own vehicles on the basis of
Invoice(s) and e-way bill without issuing the consignment note by the
appellant transporter will covered under exempted supply/ non GST
supply.
(ii) Does Rule 42 of the CGST Rules 2017 will also apply in case where
there is GST and non GST supplies and there is a common consumption of
input and input services?
Crux:- AAAR held that the services to be provided by the
appellant are leviable to GST, as specified under Notification No.
11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (as amended) read with
exemption Notifications, if applicable, as per the exact nature of
services to be provided by them. The appeal of appellant is rejected.
Order
Summary |
Section
2
of CGST |
25. |
M/s. Blackstone Diesels v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
18/12/2018
Issue: “Tax rate on “Air dryer complete with final filter for used in breaking
system of locomotive supplied to Railway” as per order attached given by
Western Railway.”
Crux:
The ‘Air Dryer complete with final filter for used in breaking system of
locomotive’ has been rightly classified by the supplier under Chapter
8421 of GST Tariff Act 2017 which attracts GST @18% (CGST 9% + SGST 9%
).
Order
Summary
|
Circular No. 30/4/2018-GST
Notification No. 1/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
24. |
Pawanputra Travels v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
19/11/2018
Issue:- Determination of applicable GST rate
on supply of non-air conditioned vehicles on hire to Indian Army.
Crux: The Service provided by the applicant is not exempted under
Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 as this Service does not fall
under ‘non-airconditioned contract carriage’ category. The service
provided is ‘rent a cab’ Service, which attracts IGST @ 5% (CGST @ 2.5%
and SGST @ 2.5%) provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and
services used in supplying the service, other than the input tax credit
of input service in the same line of business (i.e. service procured
from another service provider of tran sporting passengers in a motor
vehicle or renting of a motor vehicle) has not been taken Or IGST @ 12%
(CGST @ 6% and SGST @ 6%) if input tax credit is availed.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
23. |
M/s Umax Packaging v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
19/11/2018
Issue: Whether ITC of IGST paid on
‘bill to ship to’ model admissible to the applicant?
Crux: The applicant is eligible to claim the input tax credit
(ITC) of IGST paid on ‘bill to ship to’ model as per the relevant
provisions of Section 16 and 17 of Chapter V of CGST Act, 2017.
Order
Summary
|
Section
16
of CGST
Section
17
of CGST |
22. |
Sanjog Steels Pvt. Ltd. v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
02/11/2018
Issues:
1. Whether the supply from M/s. SSPL to M/s. X on a “Bill to Ship to”
mode as per provisions of Section 10(1)(b) of IGST Act, 2017 is
permissible?
2. Whether as per the press note dated 23.04.2018 issued in relation to
the transactions of supply u/s. 10(l)(b) of the IGST Act, 2017 the use
of E-way bill in the aforesaid facts in the column of “ship to” of
ultimate customer M/s. X is permissible ?
3. Whether in the aforesaid facts the provisions of Section 15 of the
CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 28 of CGST Rules, 2017 and in particular
the second proviso to Rule 28 would apply for the value of supply for
the transactions between M/s. SSPL and M/s. RSE and thereafter M/s. RSE
and M/s. Goyal as all are registered persons and the transactions are
business to business transactions with availability of full Input Tax
Credit?
4. Whether the transactions between M/s. Goyal and the ultimate customer
M/s. X would be covered by the provisions of Section 15 for the value of
taxable supply as they are not related persons?
Crux:
1. The supply from the Applicant to final customer on a “Bill to Ship
to” mode as per provisions of Section 10(1) (b) of IGST Act, 2017 is
permissible.
2. The applicant can issue an e-way bill in which the ‘bill to’ will be
mentioned in the name of M/s RSE/RPG whereas ‘ship to’ would be in the
name of final customer.
3. In the aforesaid facts the provisions of Section 15 of the CGST Act,
2017 read with Rule 28 of CGST Rules, 2017 and in particular the second
proviso to Rule 28 would apply for the value of supply for the
transactions between applicant and M/s. RSE with availability of full
Input Tax Credit.
4. The transactions between M/s Goyal and the ultimate customer would be
covered under the provisions of Section 15 as both are unrelated
persons, (as declared in submissions by the applicant).
Order
Summary
|
Rule 28 of CGST
Section 10 of IGST
Section
15
of CGST |
21. |
M/s Shri Kailash Chandra,(Mali
Construction) v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
29/10/2018
Issues:- Whether the activity of O
& M of Fluoride control project on ESCO Model and O & M work is supply
of goods or supply of services and what shall be the rate of GST on it?
Crux:- In the given contract, the activity of O & M of Fluoride
Control Project on ESCO Model and O &M work by the applicant is a works
contract service being undertaken for a Government Department. If the
value of supplied goods under this contract is below 25% of the total
value of the composite supply, then the rate of tax would be Nil.
Further, if in the duration of contract the applicant crosses the
benchmark of 25% value of goods then the rate of tax will shift from Nil
to 12%.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
20. |
M/s Sandvik Asia Pvt. Ltd. v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr.
Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
12/10/2018
Issues:-
1. Whether the maintenance services rendered
on customers’ equipment under the two agreements i.e. comprehensive
maintenance services agreement and supply of parts and services
agreement which also includes supply and replacement of spare parts
should be classified as ‘composite supply’ under Section 2(30) of
Central Goods and Service tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Rajasthan State
Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (RJ SGST Act) or as mixed supply under
Section 2(74) of GST Act?
2. In case the said agreements are considered as composite supply, what
is the principal supply between goods and services?
3. In case services are considered as the principal supply, what tax
rate should be applicable?
4. In respect of the said agreements, what shall be the relevant place
of supply and type of tax which needs to be discharged? (i.e. CGST &
SGST or IGST).
Crux:-
1. The activities performed under the
‘Comprehensive Maintenance Contract’ are to be treated as a composite
supply of services and the activities performed under ‘Equipment Parts
Supply and Services Agreement’ are to be treated as Mixed Supply.
2. In respect of the activities performed under ‘Comprehensive
Maintenance Contract’, the supply of Operation & Maintenance services is
the principal supply and the supply of other services are ancillary to
such principal supply.
3. The service code for Maintenance and repair services of commercial
and industrial machinery is 9987171 and the prescribed rate of GST is
18% (CGST @ 9% of the taxable value, SGST @ 9% of the taxable value) or
IGST @ 18% of the taxable value. For the supply of mixed services, the
applicant is liable to pay the highest rate of tax as per Section 8(b)
of the CGST Act, 2017.
4. As the query raised by the applicant does not fall in the categories
mentioned under Section 97(2) of CGST/SGST Act, 2017, hence the same is
accordingly disposed off.
Order
Summary
Order uphold by AAAR
Order dated 18/03/2019
Issues:- 1. Whether the maintenance services rendered on customers' equipment under the two agreements i.e. comprehensive maintenance services agreement and supply of parts and services agreement which also includes supply and replacement of spare parts should be classified as 'composite supply' under Section 2(30) of Central Goods and Service tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Rajasthan State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (RJ SGST Act) or as mixed supply under Section 2(74) of GST Act' 2. In case the said agreements are considered as composite supply, what is the principal supply between goods and services. 3. In case services are considered as the principal supply, what tax rate should be applicable. 4. In respect of the said agreements, what shall be the relevant place of supply and type of tax which needs to be discharged' (i.e. CGST & SGST or IGST).
Crux:-AAAR uphold the Advance Ruling rendered by AAR. Thus, the
activities performed by the Appellant in Agreement-2(i.e.'Equipment
Parts Supply and Services Agreement) will fall under the Mixed Supply,
as supplies of goods and services or both, or any combination thereof,
are not naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in
the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply;
Order
Summary
|
Section
8
of CGST
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
19. |
K.K. Polymers (Prop.M/s Advantage Agency Pvt. Ltd.) v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr.
Hemant Jain (SGST
Member) Order dated
13/10/2018
Issues:-
1. The amount passed on to the customer by
DCA on account of the early payment before credit period allowed by
principal. Whether any “supply” arises in this transaction? Who is the
supplier and receiver in the transaction?
2. If yes, what will be the classification of such Supply and its HSN/SAC
Code and applicable GST Rate?
3. If the transaction is termed as “Supply”, whether the aforementioned
supply is exempted from Goods and Service Tax under CGST Notification
No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017,
applicable w.e.f. 01.07.2017, as amended from time to time and
corresponding Raj. GST Notification issued by Government of Rajasthan or
any other notifications/rules under GST law?
4. If GST is charged by
the customer on invoice for such transaction, Whether the dealer/DCA can
take credit of the ITC of the GST charged on such supply considering the
fact that dealer has outward supply as (i) Commission Agent Service on
which GST is paid @ 18% (ii) the Finance in terms of Loan and advance on
which interest income arises which is exempt under CGST Notification No.
12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017, applicable w.e.f.
01.07.2017, as amended from time to time and corresponding Raj. GST
Notification issued by Government of Rajasthan?
Crux:-
1. The additional bonus passed on by the
applicant (DCA) to the customer, is not in nature of a supply in
accordance with GST Act, 2017.
2. & 3. Not applicable since the transaction is not a supply.
4. Since, the said transaction is not a supply by the customer; invoice
cannot be raised/issued by the customer and if any amount passes on to
the DCA in any manner, the DCA is not entitled to take ITC of the said
amount passed on by the customer.
Order
Summary
|
|
18. |
M/s Frizo India Private Limited v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST
Member) Order dated
24/09/2018
Issues:-
Applicable GST Rate on supply of Solar Power Generating System.
Crux:- The nature of work is of Erection, Procurement and
Commissioning of Solar Generating System which falls under the ambit
“Works Contract Services” (SAC 9954) of Notification no. 11/2017 Central
Tax (Rate) dated 28 June, 2017 and shall attract 18% rate of tax under
IGST Act, or 9% each under the CGST and SGST Acts, aggregating to 18%.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Rajasthan
RFE
Solar Private Limited
(Summary)
AR of Maharashtra
Giriraj Renewables private Limited
(Summary)
AR of Maharashtra
Fermi Solar Farms private Limited
(Summary)
AR of Karnataka
M/s Giriraj Renewables Private
Ltd.
(Summary)
AR of Uttrakhand
M/s Eapro
Global Limited
(Summary)
AR of Rajasthan
M/s Solai Redirect India LLP
(Summary)
AR of Andhra Pradesh
Dinesh Kumar Agrawal
(Summary)
AR of Maharashtra
Swati Dubey
Summary
|
17. |
M/s Solai Redirect India LLP v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST
Member) Order dated
15/09/2018
Issues:- Whether EPC contract for
set up of solar power generating system be considered as a composite
supply with PV modules being the principal supply and be taxed at a rate
of 5% (i.e. tax rate applicable on the P.V. modules)?
Crux:- The scope of work in respect of “Turnkey Composite EPC
Contract” includes designing, planning civil works, procurement of good,
erection, testing and commissioning. Accordingly, “Turnkey EPC Contract”
is not covered under Entry 234 of Schedule 1 of the Notification no.
1/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) and falls under the ambit “ Works Contract
Services” ( SAC 9954 ) of Notification 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated
28 June, 2017 and attracts 18% rate of tax under IGST Act, or 9% each
under the CGST and SGST Acts.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Rajasthan
RFE
Solar Private Limited
(Summary)
AR of Maharashtra
Giriraj Renewables private Limited
(Summary)
AR of Maharashtra
Fermi Solar Farms private Limited
(Summary)
AR of Karnataka
M/s Giriraj Renewables Private
Ltd.
(Summary)
AR of Uttrakhand
M/s Eapro
Global Limited
(Summary)
AR of Andhra Pradesh
Dinesh Kumar Agrawal
(Summary)
AR of Maharashtra
Swati Dubey
Summary
AR of Rajasthan
M/s Frizo
India Private Limited
(Summary)
|
16. |
M/s Nagaur Mukangarh Highways Pvt. Ltd. v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST
Member) Order dated
15/09/2018
Issues:- 1. Whether they are
eligible to Claim full ITC pertaining to procurement of goods and
services for construction of the project during the Construction Period,
as the entire revenue received during the said period is subject to GST?
2. Whether they are eligible to Claim ITCs pertaining to procurement of
goods and services during the 0 & M period after reversal of ITC as per
Section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 42 of the CGST Rule,
2017 as Annuity Payment received during the said period is exempt
whereas 0 & M payments received are subject to GST?
Crux:- 1. The Applicant is rendering taxable services during the
construction, of roads which is liable to tax; hence they are entitled
to claim full ITC under.the provisions of section 16(1) of the CGST Act.
2017.
2. The Applicant is entitled to claim ITC on supplies of goods and
services or both procured for use in outward supply of 0 & M service
purpose, as they are paying GST on 100 percent of the amount received on
account of 0 & M of the Project.
Order
Summary
Order modified by AAAR Order dated
13/02/2019 Issues:-
(1) claim full ITC pertaining to procurement of goods and services for
construction of the project during the Construction Period, as the entire
revenue received during the said period is subject to GST; and
(2) claim ITC pertaining to procurement of goods and services during the
O & M period after reversal of ITC as per Section 17(2) of the Central
Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 42 of the Central Goods
and Services Tax Rule, 2017 as Annuity Payment received during the said
period is exempt .
Crux:-(1).
Annuity payments are exempted by virtue of Entry No. 23A of the
notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. However,
only 50% ITC of the GST paid on the Input and Input service
used in the construction phase is available to the Appellant subject to the
provisions of Section 17(5) of the Central GST Act, 2017.
(2). Full ITC of the GST paid on the inputs and input services used in the O&M
phase is available to the Appellant subject to the provisions of Section 17(5)
of the Central GST Act, 2017.
Order
Summary
|
Section
16
of CGST
Section
17
of CGST |
15. |
M/s Shubhlaxmi Cold Storage and Ice
Factory Private
Limited v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST
Member) Order dated
15/09/2018
Issues:-
Whether charges received by the cold storage
for providing service of storing of eggs, which is produce of rearing of
animals/poultry farming in cold storage is exempted from payment of GST
in terms of S. no. 24 of Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) and S. no.
54 of Notification no. 12/2017-CT (Rate)?
Crux:- The charges received by the applicant for providing
service of storing of “fresh eggs” in shell on which no further
processing is done, which are produce of rearing of animals/poultry
farming are covered under definition of “agricultural produce and are
exempted from payment of GST in terms of entry No. 24 of Notification
No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) and entry S. No. 54 of Notification no. 12/2017-CT
(Rate) dated 28.06.2016.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Andhra Pradesh
Sardar
Mal Cold Storage & Ice Factory
Summary
AR of Gujrat
M/s. Guru Cold Storage Private Limited
Summary
|
14. |
M/s Raghav Productivity Enhancers
Limited v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST
Member) Order dated
01/09/2018
Issues:-
1. Classification and applicable rate of GST on Ramming Mass used in lining of
induction furnace.
2. Classification and applicable rate of GST on crushed quartz stones used in
lining of furnace through claimed as not containing Boric Acid.
Crux:-
1. Ramming Mass which is a Refractory
Material, is classifiable under HSN code 3816 and would attract 18% rate
of tax under GST (9% CGST + 9% SGST).
2. Quartz powder obtained by crushing Quartz stones falls
under HSN code 2806 and would attract 5% rate of tax under GST (2.5%
CGST + 2.5% SGST) .
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
13. |
M/s Chambal Fertilizers and Chemicals
Limited v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST
Member) Order dated
25/08/2018
Issues:-(a)
Whether in the case of import of goods on CIF (COST, INSURANCE AND
FREIGHT) basis, the Applicant (Importer) is liable to pay GST on the
component of Ocean freight paid by the foreign supplier to the shipping
company, as consideration for availing the service of transportation of
goods by sea provided by the foreign shipping entity?
(b) Whether in the case of import of goods on FOB (Free on board) basis
the Applicant (Importer), for the purpose of determination of value of
goods for the payment of IGST on import of goods is required to exclude
the value of the component of Ocean freight paid by the Applicant
(importer) to the foreign shipping entity, on which already GST is paid
by the applicant (importer) being the service recipient in order to
avoid double taxation?
Crux:-
(a) The applicant is liable to pay IGST on
transportation of goods by vessel under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM)
under Notification No. 10/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
(b) Regarding exclusion of any component of expenditure upon imported
goods (Ocean freight) is regarding determining their value at the time
of import, the same falls beyond the purview of Section 97 of CGST/RGST
Act, 2017.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 10/2017
Integrated Tax (Rate)
AR of Uttrakhand
M/s Bahl
Paper Mills Ltd.
Summary |
12. |
M/s PDCOR Limited v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST
Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member)
Order dated 25/08/2018
Issues:-1.
Whether service provided by M/s PDCOR Ltd is correctly classified under
SAC Code 9983?
2. Whether Jaipur Development Authority falls under the definition of
Local Authority or Governmental Authority or Government Entity?
3. Whether the aforementioned services being provided by M/s PDCOR Ltd.
in the above case are exempted from Goods and Service Tax under the
serial number 3 of CGST Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
dated 28th June 2017, applicable w.e.f 01.07.2017, as amended from
time to time and corresponding Raj. GST Notification issued by
Government of Rajasthan?
Crux:-
1. The PMC Services provided by M/s PDCOR
Ltd. to the JDA in the “Project Management Consulting Services (PMCs)
for Rejuvenation of Amanishah Nallah (Dravyavati River), Jaipur” are
correctly classified under SAC Code 9983.
2. Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) is a Governmental Authority.
3. The PMC Services provided are pure services hence covered under SI.
No.3 of Notification 12 /2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017
(Notification No. F.12 (56) FD/Tax/2017-Pt-I-50 Dated 29/09/2017 issued
by the Government of Rajasthan.) and hence exempt from GST.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
11. |
Smita Gupta v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST
Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member)
Order dated 18/08/2018
Issues:-Classification
parts supplied as parts of complete sprinkler or drip irrigation system
and also as spares under Entry 195B of Schedule II of Notification No.
01/2017?
Crux:-
As per entry No. 195B of the schedule II of Notification No. 1/2017 – CT
(Rate) Laterals of sprinklers such as clamps, bends, tee, coupler, bush,
foot button, latch, clamp, riser pipe, socket etc. are not covered to
attract GST 12% (CGST 6% + SGST 6%) but instead will attract GST at 18%
(CGST 9% + SGST 9%). Laterals of drip irrigation system will attract GST
12% (CGST 6% + SGST 6%).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
10. |
M/s Tag Solar System v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST
Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member)
Order dated 18/08/2018
Issues:-1. Whether Supply, commissioning,
installation and maintenance of Solar Water Pumping System would be
taxable at the rate of 5% considering it as a composite supply where the
principle supply being that of goods i.e. supply of Solar Power
generating system having HSN Code 84 or 85?
2. Whether separate bills can be raised by the Applicant with respect to
Supply and Goods and Supply of Services Purely in respect of the
contract of the Applicant with RHDS enclosed herewith?
3. Will the said transaction be classified as a “Works Contract” and
taxable at the rate of 18% being Supply of Services?
Crux:-
1. “Supply, installation, commissioning
and maintenance of Solar Water Pumping Systems” falls under the purview
of Works Contract as per Section 2(119) of GST Act and not covered under
Entry 234 of Schedule I of the Notification no. 1/2017 – Central Tax
(Rate), dated 28lh of June, 2017 under HSN code 84 or 85.
2. As per terms and conditions of agreement, it is a single contract of
supply, installation, commissioning and maintenance of Solar Water
Pumping Systems and hence cannot be split in two separate contracts.
Therefore separate bills for supply of goods and supply of services
cannot be raised.
3. The contract for “supply, installation, commissioning and maintenance
of Solar Water Pumping Systems” falls under the ambit of ” Works
Contract Services” which comes under the purview of Works Contract as
per Section 2(119) of CGST Act and attracts 18% rate of tax under IGST
Act, or 9% each under the CGST and SGST Acts, aggregating to 18%.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
9. |
M/s KEI Industries Limited v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa
(CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member)
Order dated 01/08/2018
Issues:-Whether
the power cables supplied would be covered under the scope of SI. No. 1
of Notification No. 03/2017-CT?
Crux:-
“Electrical Cables” do not fall under
Entry no. 24 of list as ‘material’, ‘accessories’, ‘consumables’, and/or
‘stores’ of SI. No. 1 of Notification No. 03/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 03/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
8. |
M/s RFE Solar Private Limited v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa
(CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member)
Order dated 01/07/2018
Issues:-Whether
Supply of Solar Power Plants is considered as supply of goods or supply
of services?
Crux:-
The transaction for EPC Contract for the Solar Power Plant which
includes engineering, design, procurement, supply, development, testing
and commissioning is a works contract” in terms of section 2(119) of the
GST Act as supply of services.
The contract for EPC of Solar Power Plant falls under the ambit ” Works
Contract Services” ( SAC 9954 ) of Notification no. 11/2017 Central Tax
(Rate) dated 28 June, 2017 and attracts 18% rate of tax under IGST Act,
or 9% each under the CGST and SGST Acts.
Order
Summary
Order upheld by AAAR
Order dated 29/11/2018 Issues:-(i) Whether contract for
supply of/construction of a Solar Power Plant, wherein both goods and services
are supplied, can be construed to be a composite supply in terms of Section
2(30) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as claimed by the
appellant or the same is Works Contract Services as per the Ruling made by the
AAR.
(ii) Whether ‘Solar Power Generating System’ is a movable or immovable property
(iii) If the transaction is treated as a ‘composite supply’, whether the
Principal Supply in such case can be said to be ‘solar power generating system’
which is taxable at 5% GST? Crux:-
The said Turnkey EPC contract is a
‘composite supply’ under section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017.The said composite
supply falls within the definition of Works contract under section 2(119) of the
CGST Act, 2017 (SAC9954) and attracts 18% rate of tax (either 9% each under CGST
Act and RGST Act or 18% under IGST Act)
In view of holding the transaction as a ‘Works contract’ and Para 6 of SCHEDULE
II of CGST Act treating ‘Works contracts’ as supply of ‘services’ , there arises
no occasion to go into the issue of ‘ Principal supply’.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Maharashtra
Giriraj Renewables
private Limited
(Summary)
AR of Maharashtra
Fermi Solar Farms private Limited
(Summary)
AR of Andhra Pradesh
Dinesh Kumar Agrawal
(Summary)
AR of Maharashtra
Swati Dubey
Summary
AR of Karnataka
M/s Giriraj Renewables Private
Ltd.
(Summary)
AR of Uttrakhand
M/s Eapro
Global Limited
(Summary)
AR of Rajasthan
M/s Solai Redirect India LLP
(Summary)
AR of Rajasthan
M/s Frizo
India Private Limited
(Summary)
|
7. |
M/s Jaimin Engineering Private Limited
v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member)
Order dated 01/07/2018
Issues:-
Whether the applicant is required to take
registration in Rajasthan where he is providing service relating to
construction of cold storage?
Crux:-While supplying services if
the supplier of services (i.e. applicant who in the given case is a
Works Contractor and is registered in State of Gujarat) has any place of
business/office in the State of Rajasthan i.e. has a fixed establishment
for operation in State of Rajasthan (place where the services are to be
provided) then he is required to get himself registered in State of
Rajasthan.
Order
Summary
|
Section 22
of CGST |
6. |
M/s Rara Udhyog v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST
Member) Order dated
23/06/2018
Issues:-
1. Whether the activity of the applicant is
covered by Entry S. No. 24 (i)(i)(c) or S. No. 24(i)(iii)
of Notification No. 11/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated
28/06/2017 attracting NIL rate of tax .
2. Whether the activity of the applicant is covered by Entry S. No.
54(c) or Entry No. 55 of Notification No. 12/2017 Central tax (Rate)
dated 28/06/2017 attracting NIL rate of tax.
Crux:- The activity of the applicant i.e. M/s Rara Udhyog, Jaipur is
not covered by Entry S. No. 24 (i)(i)(c) or S. No. 24(i)(iii)
of Notification No. 11/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 AND
Entry S. No. 54(c) or Entry No. 55 of Notification No. 12/2017 Central
tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 & will not attract NIL rate of tax.
Order
Summary
Order upheld by AAAR
Order dated 31/10/2018
Issues:- Whether the activity of
cleaning of the above produce is exempted under the Entry S. No. 24 (i)(i)(c) and 24(i)(iii)
of Notification No. 11/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 and Entry S. No.
54(c) and 55 of Notification No 12/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/6/17?"
Crux:-AAAR upheld the order of AAR
that the activity of the Appellant is not covered by Entry S. No. 24 (i)(i)(c)
or S. No. 24(i)(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017 Central tax (Rate)
dated 28/06/2017 AND Entry S. No. 54(c) or Entry No. 55 of Notification
No 12/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/6/17.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
5. |
Rhizo Organic v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST
Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member) Order dated 16/06/2018
Issues:-
a) Whether the Bio Fertilizer covered
under the definition of Organic Manure (HSN code 3101)?
b) What is the rate of GST applicable on Bio Fertilizer if it is not
covered under Organic Manure (HSN Code: 3101)?
Crux:-
a) Bio-Fertilizers are
made of animals (micro-organisms) and hence covered within the standard
description of the HSN Code 3101.
b) Bio Fertilizer or Organic Manure other than those put up in Unit
Container and bearing a brand name; will be covered under Schedule I of
rate of GST on Goods and attracts NIL rate of duty & if put up in Unit
Container and bearing a brand name, will be taxable under GST @ 5%.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 01/2017
Central Tax (Rate) |
4. |
Habufa Meubelen B.V. (Indian Liaison
Office) v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST
Member) Order dated 16/06/2018
Issues:-
a) Whether the reimbursement of expenses
and salary paid by M/s Habufa Meubelen B.V.(HO) to the liaison office
established in India is liable to GST as supply of services, especially
when no consideration for any services is charged/ paid?
b) Whether the applicant i.e. the Liaison Office is required to get
registered under GST?
c) If it is assumed that the reimbursement of expenses and salary
claimed by liaison office is a consideration towards a service, then
what will be the place of supply of such service?
Crux:- a) If the liaison office
in India does not render any consultancy or other services
directly/indirectly, with or without any consideration and the liaison
office does not have significant commitment powers ,except those which
are required for normal functioning of the office, on behalf of Head
Office, then the reimbursement of expenses and salary paid by M/s Habufa
Meubelen B.V. (HO) to the Liaison Office, established in India, is not
liable to GST
b) M/s Habufa Meubelen B.V. Jaipur, is not required to get itself
registered under GST as there are no taxable supplies made by the
Liaison office.
c) HO and Liaison Office cannot be treated as separate persons, there
cannot be any flow of services between them as one cannot provide
service to self and therefore, the reimbursement of expenses made by the
HO cannot be treated as a consideration towards any service.
Order
Summary
|
Section 7 of CGST
Section 22 of CGST |
3. |
Sardar Mal Cold Storage & Ice Factory v/s
Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member) Order dated 11/06/2018
Issues:-
a) Whether the mentioned goods which comes for
storage will come under the definition of agricultural produce or not?
b) Whether the supply of Cold Storage services by the applicant firm to
various products as mentioned herein below attracts Nil rate of duty or
not as per Notification No. 11/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017?
Crux:-
a) Goods mentioned under Group A fall under
the definition of Agricultural Produce in terms of the aforesaid
notification and so supply of cold storage service in relation to these
is exempt from the levy of GST. However if any processing is done on
these products as is not usually done by a cultivator or producer at
farm level , then these would fall outside the definition of
agricultural produce as given in the aforesaid Notification and in that
case supply of cold storage service in relation to these would remain
chargeable to GST.
b) Goods mentioned under Group B to G are not Agricultural produce in
terms of the aforesaid notification and so the supply of cold storage
service in relation to these would remain chargeable to GST.
Order
Summary
Order upheld by AAAR Order dated 15/10/2018
Issues:-Whether
the goods mentioned in Group A to Group G which comes for storage will
come under the definition of Agricultural produce or not and whether the
supply of Cold Storage services by the appellant to the goods attracts
Nil rate of tax or not as per Notification No. 11/2017 Central tax
(Rate) dated 28/06/2017 and Notification No 12/2017 -Central Tax (Rate)
dated 28/06/2017?"
Crux:-AAAR doesn’t find any reason to interfere with the Ruling
given by the Authority for Advance Ruling. Hence as ruled AAR Goods
mentioned under Group A fall under the definition of Agricultural
Produce in terms of the aforesaid notification and so supply of cold
storage service in relation to these is exempt from the levy of GST.
However if any processing is done on these products as is not usually
done by a cultivator or producer at farm level , then these would fall
outside the definition of agricultural produce as given in the aforesaid
Notification and in that case supply of cold storage service in relation
to these would remain chargeable to GST.
Goods mentioned under Group B to G are not Agricultural produce in terms
of the aforesaid notification and so the supply of cold storage service
in relation to these would remain chargeable to GST.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Gujarat
Guru Cold Storage Private Limited
(Summary)
AR of Rajasthan
M/s Shubhlaxmi
Cold Storage
Summary |
2. |
M/s TP Ajmer Distribution Limited v/s
Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member) Order dated 11/05/2018
Issues:-
Whether it is eligible to avail the
exemption from levy of GST under entry 25 of Notification no. 12/2017-
Central Tax (Rate) with respect to non tariff charges recovered by TPADL
from customers'
Crux:- The services provided by M/s
TPADL with respect to non-tariff charges recovered from their customers
are not eligible for exemption as clarified vide Circular no. 34/8/2018
and is liable to pay tax on the aforesaid recovery made from their
customers.
Order
Summary
Order by AAAR Order dated
18/10/2018
Issues:- 1. whether the delayed payment charges collected from the consumers for delay in
payment of consideration for supply of electricity is liable to GST in terms of
Section 15(2) of the CGST Act, 2017; and
2. whether the cheque dishonor fee collected by the appellants is liable to GST
.
Crux:- AAAR ruled that no GST is
chargeable on the delayed payment charges collected from the consumers
for delay in payment of consideration for supply of electricity . While
GST is chargeable on the cheque dishonor charges collected ( by whatever
name) from the consumers.
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 12/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
Circular No. 34/8/2018-GST
|
1. |
M/s Tata Projects Limited v/s Mr. Nitin Wapa (CGST Member) and Mr. Sudhir Sharma (SGST Member) Order dated 27/04/2018
Issues:-
a) Whether Jaipur Development
Authority is covered under the status of Government Authority/Entity or
not?
b) Whether enhancement of utility of
Dravyawati river, construction of sewage treatment plants, laying of
pipelines, constructions of interception chambers etc provided under the
contract are covered under Sl. No. 3(vi)(a) of Notification No.
11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dt. 28.06.17 amended with Notification No.
24/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dt. 21.09.17 and further amended with
Notification No. 31/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dt. 13.10.17?
c) Determination of Rate of GST
applicable for the project?
d) Determination of Rate of GST applicable on subcontractor leg?
Crux:- Services provided by M/S
TPL are covered under s.no. 3(vi)(a) of Notification no. 11/2017-
Central Tax (Rate) amended vide Notification no. 24/2017- Central Tax
(Rate) and further amended vide Notification no. 31/2017- Central Tax
(Rate) and GST @ 12% is applicable on the services provided under said
contract. The same rate is also applicable to the sub contractor leg as
inserted in Notification no. 01/2018- Central Tax (Rate).
Order
Summary
|
Notification No. 11/2017
Central Tax (Rate)
|