MADHYA PRADESH ADVANCE RULINGS
S.No. |
Description |
Related Information |
45. |
M/s Dee Vee Projects Limited v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 28/08/2020
Issue: 1. What is rate of tax applicable to the composite supply of
works contract as defined in clause (119) of Section 2 of Central Goods
and Service Tax Act, 2017 (The Act), undertaken by the supplier
(applicant) i.e., whether the GST rate 18% or 12% is to be charged by
the supplier? |
|
44. |
M/s Khatwani Sales and Services LLP v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 23/07/2020
Issue: Whether the input tax credit on the demo vehicle purchased
can be availed as the same will be capitalized in books? |
|
43. |
Atriwal Amusement Park v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 09/06/2020
Issue:
1. Whether we are eligible to take credit on input tax paid on purchase of water slides? water slides are made up of strong PVC. |
|
42. |
Agarwal Coal Corporation Pvt. Ltd v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 08/06/2020
Issue:
1. Whether the applicant is liable to discharge tax liability @ 18% on coal
handling and distribution charges wherever supply of such services is intended
to be made expressly to a customer or will the applicant be entitled to charge
GST at the rate of 5% as applicable on supply of coal? |
|
41. |
Jabalpur Hotels Private Limited v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 08/06/2020
Issue:
whether Input credit on purchase of Lift would be available to Hotel as
it has been used in the course or for the furtherance of business? |
|
40. |
V.E. Commercial Vehicles Limited v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 02/06/2020
Issue: Whether the supply towards provision of services in respect of activity of mounting/ fabrication of bodies on chassis provided by customer should be treated as supply of bus or provision of services in respect of activity of mounting/fabrication of bus body on the chassis wherein the said activity of mounting/fabrication is outsourced to the applicant by owner/provider of chassis in following two scenarios:- Rectification order V.E. Commercial Vehicles Limited v/s Virendra Kumar Jain , Shri Manoj kumar Choubey.Order Dated 09/06/2020 In said order the words and number under entry no. 26(ii) read as nder entry no. 26(iv) Rest of the order/ruling will be same as in the original order. |
|
39. |
Methodex Systems Private Limited v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 05/03/2020
Issue:
1.Whether the fork relating to "supply, installation and fixing of customized
furniture in a building" is composite supply of goods or in the nature of works
contract?
Crux: 1. The activities of supply,
installation and fixing of furniture to be performed by the applicant
cannot be classified under Heading 9954 - Construction services, as
provided in serial no. of Notification no.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
dated, 28.06.2017, as amended from time to time. Rather, the contract
conforms to composite supply as provided in Section 2(30) of GST Act,
2017. The supply made by the applicant consists of two taxable supplies
of goods and services which are naturally bundled and supplied in
conjunction with each other, where the supply of goods i.e. furniture is
the principal supply. |
|
38. |
Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Good
Governance & Policy Analysis v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 02/03/2020
Issue:
1. Whether the amount recovered by the applicant from other government
departments for doing research work and study, which help them make policies or
understand its impact, chargeable to GST?
Crux: 1.The amount recovered by the
applicant from other government departments for doing research work and
study, which help them make policies or understand its impact, shall be
exempt subject to satisfaction of conditions laid down under entry no. 3
of Notification no. 12/2017-CTR dated 28th June 2017. |
|
37. |
M/s Unity Traders v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 10/02/2020
Issue: 1.Whether ITC of GST paid on goods purchased for the purpose of construction &
maintenance of warehouse such as vitrified tiles, marble, granite, acp sheet,
steel plates, tmt tor (saria), bricks, cement, paint and other construction
material can be claimed in full?
Crux: 1. It was held that, No ITC of GST paid on
goods purchased for the purpose of construction & maintenance of
warehouse such as vitrified tiles, marble, granite, acp sheet, steel
plates, tmt tor (saria), bricks, cement, paint and other construction
material is admissible under Section 17(5) of CGST Act, 2017. |
|
36. |
M/s Vihan Enterprises v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 16/01/2020
Issue: 1. Whether the explanation to entry no. 234 of Schedule- I to Notification no.
1/2017 - Central Tax (Rate), as amended from time to time, shall apply to
construction of new 33 / 220 kV Pooling Substation at Badwar, REWA along with
associated 220 kV DCDS Transmission line (Route length 3.0 Kms) and associated
feeder bay work on total Turnkey basis against Bid Identification No.
RUMS/2016-17/372/014 (Lot-I) under World Bank Financing?
Crux: 1. Goods listed in Entry No. 234 of Notification No.
1/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) are not part of the supply and therefore,
the Explanation to Entry No. 234 of Notification No. 1/2017 - Central
Tax (Rate) shall not apply to the supply of works contract service in
contract of construction of new 33 / 220 kV Pooling Substation at Badwar,
REWA along with associated 220 kV DCDS Transmission line (Route length
3.0 Kms) and associated feeder bay work on total Turnkey basis against
Bid Identification No. RUMS/2016-17/372/014 (Lot-I) under World Bank
Financing for Rewa Ultra Mega Solar Limited. |
|
35. |
M/s Vidit Builders v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 06/01/2020
Issue:1.Whether it is covered in para 5 of Schedule III (Sale of Land) or classified
under works contract. |
|
34. |
M/s Vippy Industries Ltd. v/s Virendra
Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 02/01/2020
Issue:
whether the product “Preparation of a kind used in animal feeding – Bio
Processed Meal” will fall under HS Code 23099090 and applicable rate of
GST on said product shall be ‘Nil’ as per Notification 02/2017-CT (Rate)
dated 28.06.2017? Rectification order M/s Vippy Industries Ltd. v/s Virendra Kumar Jain , Shri Manoj kumar Choubey.Order Dated 28/02/2020 The product “Preparation of a kind used in Animal Feeding - Bio Processed Meal” is entitled to classify under HS code - 23099090 and therefore entitled to clear the said goods for specific use of Animal Feeding without payment of GST under serial no. 102 of the Notification No.02/2017-CT(Rate) dated 28.06.17 and corresponding notification issued under MPGST Act. |
|
33. |
M/s. Alisha Foods v/s Manoj Kumar
Choubey Joint Commissioner and Virendra Kumar Jain Joint
Commissioner. Order Dated 28/11/2019 Issue: The applicant has sought an advance ruling regarding Classification of Fried Fryums of different shapes, sizes and varieties which are ready to eat and What is the HSN Code and GST rate applicable on such goods manufactured.?
Crux: The product ‘Fried Fryums’ manufactured and supplied by the
applicant is classifiable under Tariff Item 2106 90 99 of the First
Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. |
|
32. |
Prakash Chand Jain v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 08/05/2019
Issue: (a) What shall be GST rate on Torch with input socket to recharge from solar
panel?
Crux: Nano Rechargeable LED Torch Light is classifiable
under Chapter Heading 8513 presently attracting GST @18%. |
|
31. |
M/s Indo Thai Securities Limited
v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 25/06/2019 Issue: whether there is any tax liability on such additional amount (termed as Interest) charged on delayed payment?
Crux: The stock broking service is the principal supply and
all other ancillary supplies shall take colors from the principal supply
itself and it shall be classified as principal supplies i.e. Stock
Broking Services. Regarding the applicability of Notification No.
12/2017, it was held that the additional amount being charged cannot be
termed as interest. Hence the exemption vide entry no 27 of Notification
no 12 / 2017 cannot be applied on the same. |
|
30. |
M/S World Researchers Associations
v/s
Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 25/09/2019 Issue: Whether the activities performed by the Association are covered under the definition of Charitable Activities as defined under clause 2(r) of Notification No.12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017?" Crux: Promotions of Research and Publishing of online research journal are not activities contemplated in the exemption entry since they do not fall under care or counselling; or spreading public awareness; or advancement of religion, spirituality or yoga; or advancement of educational programmes or skill development. In absence of facts of such seminar/symposium/convention, Advance ruling can't be passed on Organization of Seminars, Symposiums and Conventions of the nature organized by the Applicant. |
|
29. |
M/S Kalyan Toll Infrastructure Ltd v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 25/09/2019
Issue: (a) Whether work constitutes composite contract or is it separate contract for
each work under taken? Crux: The tender document in question is a not consolidated contract and each supply under the said contract shall be chargeable to tax individually, depending upon the individual classification of such supplies and rate of tax applicable at the time of supply. |
|
28. |
M/s Madhya Pradesh Power Generating
Company Limited v/s Virendra Kumar Jain
, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 25/09/2019
Issue:1. Whether charging GST @5% of transportation services by Goods Transport Agency
(GTA) by road under RCM and 18% on coal beneficiation and loading charges is in
compliance with the provisions of the GST Law? |
|
27. |
Force Motors Limited v/s
Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 25/09/2019 Issue: whether to classify Utility Van under chapter heading 8703 or chapter heading 8704?" Crux: Utility Vehicles, predominantly designed for transportation of goods conforming to the norms of Category N vehicles as per Automotive Industry Standards AIS 053, shall merit classification under Chapter 8704 of the GST Tariff and shall be chargeable to GST at the rate prevailing at the time of supply. |
|
26. |
M/S Bhavika Bhatia v/s
Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 25/09/2019
Issue:1.Applicability of serial no.15(b) (HSN/SAC Code 9964) of exemption Notification
No.12/2017-CT(Rate), dated 28.6.2017 as amended, for transportation of their
students and staff under contract carriage by Non-A/c buses?
Crux: 1. Services provided by the applicant for transportation of
students and staff of the contracee's Institute under contract carriage
by non-air conditioned buses is exempt from GST as per clause (b) of
SI.No.15 of Notification No.12/2017-CT(Rate), dated 28.6.2017. However
the exemption will be valid only till the time the contract carriage
fulfils the conditions laid down in the said notification. |
|
25. |
M/S NMDC Limited v/s Rajiv Agrawal Additional Commissioner and manoj kumar choubey joint
commissioner. offices of the joint commissioner of commercial tax,
indore division-1 Order Dated 18/07/2019
Issue:
1. Whether royalty paid in respect of Mining Lease can be classified under
“Licensing services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and
evaluation falling under the heading 9973 attracting GST at the same rate of tax
as applicable on supply of like goods involving transfer of title in goods”?
Crux: 1. Royalty paid in respect of Mining Lease can be
classified under Tariff Heading 99733. |
|
24. |
M/S Directorate Of Skill Development v/s
Rajiv Agrawal Additional Commissioner and manoj kumar choubey joint
commissioner. offices of the joint commissioner of commercial tax,
indore division-1 Order Dated 18/07/2019 Issue: "Whether the services received by it from a provider of service located in a non taxable territory would attract the provision of sec 5(3) read along with Notification No 10/2017 IT(R). In other words, whether applicant is liable to pay tax under reverse charge mechanism on the transaction mentioned "? Crux: The applicant shall be liable to pay IGST on Import of service under Reverse Charge Mechanism in terms of Notification No. 10/2017-lT(R). |
|
23. |
Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Company
Limited v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 24/07/2019
Issue:1. Rate of GST on contract for construction of building and structure for colony
at village Siveria at 2×660 MW Shree Singaji Thermal Power Project Stage -II
Khandwa.
Crux: The work contract awarded to Shreeji Infrastructure P.Ltd.
for construction of 599 residential quarters at Shree Singaji Thennal
Power Project Stage-II shall attract GST @18% (9% CGST +9% SGST) under
SAC 9954. |
Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
|
22. |
Emrald Heights Interneational School v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 24/07/2019
Issue:
a. Will the consideration received by the school from the participant school(s)
for participation of their students and staff in the conference would be
exempted under entry No. 66 or entry No. 1 or entry No. 80 or any other entry of
the Notification No.12/2017 — Central Tax (Rate) or will be chargeable to GST
under CGST Act, 2017 & MP’ GST Act, 2017 or IGST Act, 2017?
Crux: a. The consideration received by the school from the
participant school(s) for participation of their students and
staff in the impugned conference would not be exempted under entry No. 66 or
entry No. 1 or entry No. 80 or any other entry of the Notification No. 12/2017 —
Central Tax (Rate) or will be chargeable to GST under CGST Act, 2017 & MP GST
Act, 2017 or IGST Act, 2017 and concurrent notifications issued by the State Tax
authorities. |
Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
|
21. |
M/s Ravi Masand v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 24/07/2019 Issue: Classification of “Agriculture Knapsack Sprayer” and applicable tax rate?
Crux: The product Agriculture Mechanical Sprayer will merit
classification under Chapter Head 8424 of the GST Tariff and
with effect from 25.01.2018, the said product would attract GST @12% in terms of
Sr.No. 195B of Schedule-II to Notification No. 01/2017-CT(R) as amended vide
Notification No.06/2018-CT(R) dtd. 25.012.018 and concurrent notifications
issued by the State Tax authorities. |
Notification No. 01/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
|
20. |
Sanghi Brothers (Indore) Prv. Ltd. v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 03/05/2019 Issue: Whether building of body after utilizing and consuming owned materials and providing labour and further amounting the same on chassis of the principal would amount to supply of Services
Crux: Mounting of Bus/ Truck /Ambulance body on the chassis to be
supplied by the Principal on delivery challan or any other owner of the
chassis on which Bus/ Truck /Ambulance body will be fabricated by
collecting job work charges including inputs required for such
fabrication work and in no case the ownership of the chassis will be
transferred by Applicant to the job worker will be taxable under SAC
998881 — “Motor vehicle and trailer manufacturing services” and under
entry no. 26(ii) as “Manufacturing services on physical inputs (goods)
owned by other” it is taxable @18%(9% under CGST and 9% under SGST Act). |
|
19. |
E-DP Marketing Prv. Ltd. v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 02/05/2019 Issue: Whether the applicant/importer is again required to pay IGST on the component of ocean freight under RCM mechanism on deemed amount which will amount to double taxation of IGST on the deemed component of ocean freight of the imported goods?
Crux:The Applicant shall be liable to pay IGST on ocean freight
paid on imported goods under Reverse Charge Mechanism in terms of
Notification No.10/2017-IT(R) and Notification No.8/2017-IT(R)
irrespective of the ocean freight component having been a part of the
CIF value of imported goods. |
|
18. |
Network For Information & Computer v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 10/04/2019 Issue: Sr. No. 72 of Not. No. 12/2017 Central Tax(Rate), dated 28-06-17 issued by the Central Government under CGST Act, 2017 and exemption provided under Sr. No. 72 of Not. No. FA-3-42/2017-1-V(53) dated 30-06-2017 issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government under M.P. Goods & Services Act, 2017 is applicable for the applicant?
Crux: The Applicant shall not be entitled to avail benefit of
exemption as envisaged under SI.No.72 of Notification No.12/2017-Central
Tax (Rate) dt. 28.06.2017 and SI.No.72 of Notification
No.FA-3-42/2017/1/V(53) dtd. 30.06.2017 in respect of the services of
training provided to Uttar Pradesh Skill Development Corporation. |
Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
|
17. |
Rohan Coach Builders v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 10/04/2019 Issue: The applicant as whether the activity of building and mounting of the body by the applicant on the chassis provided by the Principle will result in supply of goods under HSN 8707 or supply of services under HSN 9988 taxable @ 18% irrespective of end use by the principle who shall effect the sale of Bus. Crux: In respect of the question raised by the applicant we hold that on fabrication of bus body on the chassis to be supplied by the OEMs (Principal) on delivery challan or any other owner of the chassis on which bus body will be fabricated by collecting job work charges including inputs required for such fabrication work and in no case the ownership of the chassis will be transferred by Principal to the applicant will be taxable under SAC 998881 – “Motor vehicle and trailer manufacturing services” and under entry no. 26(ii) as “Manufacturing services on physical inputs (goods) owned by other” it is taxable @18%(9% under CGST and 9% under SGST Act). |
|
16. |
M/s Narsingh Transport v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 18/02/2019 Issue: Whether the GST paid on the cars provided to different customers on lease rent will be available to it as INPUT TAX CREDIT(ITC) in terms of Section 17(5) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
Crux: 1. The Applicant is entitled to avail ITC on cars
(passenger vehicles) which are further supplied to customers on lease
rent, subject to condition applicable in such supply of services as per
notification number 11/2017-Central Tax(Rate) Dated 28.06.17 as amended
from time to time and corresponding notifications issued under MPGST
Act. |
Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) Section 17 of CGST |
15. |
M/s J C Genetic India Private Limited v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 21/01/2019
Issue: 1. Whether exemption provided under Sr.No.74 of Notification No.12/2017 -
Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is applicable to the applicant.?
Crux: The Applicant is not entitled for the benefit of serial no.
74 and para 2 (s) of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated
28.06.2017 and corresponding notification issued under MPGST Act. |
|
14. |
M/s Nagrani Warehouseing Private Limited v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey. Order Dated 14/12/2018 Issue: Determining the classification of P.P. Bags which are made from strips having width of less than 5mm. whether the PP bags would classify under chapter heading 63 or chapter 39 of the GST Tariff and what shall be the rate of GST on the same?” Crux: The goods in question shall be classifiable under Chapter 39 of the GST tariff as articles of Plastic and would attract appropriate rate prevailing at the date and time of supply. |
|
13. |
Madhya Pradesh Pashchim Kshetra Vidyut
Vitaran Company Limited v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey
Order Dated 27/08/2018 |
|
12. |
M/s Prem Ghan Products v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 23/10/2018 Issue: Whether the goods manufactured (i.e. various types of mouth freshners) by the Applicant and sold prepared by mixing various inputs/raw materials like kharak, sugar, khopra, sounf, fennel, dates, mishri, saccharin, menthol, papaya fruit, or natural flavouring substances, are liable to be classified under Chapter 21 i.e. ‘Miscellaneous Edible Preparations’ – 2106 (food preparations not elsewhere specified or included) and taxed at 18% GST as currently followed or under Chapter 20 i.e. ‘Preparations of Vegetable, fruit, nuts or other parts of plants’ and taxable at 12% GST? Crux: The product Mouth freshener as described in the Application will merit classification under Chapter Heading 2106 of the GST Tariff as ‘Food preparations not elsewhere specified or included’ and would be chargeable to GST at applicable rate under the said tariff entry, presently read with Notification No.01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dtd.28.06.2017 and the corresponding notification under MPGST Act 2017 (Sr. No.23 to Schedule III). |
|
11. |
M/s Shreeji Infrastructure India P. Ltd.
v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 18/10/2018 Issue: |
|
10. |
M/s Italian Edibles Private Limited v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 18/09/2018 Issue: Whether the product having brand name “Militry Malai Mithai”, manufactured and supplied by the applicant containing the ingredients Sugar, Vegetable Fat, Skimmed Milk Powder, Whey Powder, Emulsifier and other permitted Flavours, which is identical to the commonly known Indian sweet “Rabdi”, should be classified under the Tariff Heading 2106 as Sweet Meats or under Tariff Heading 0404 as other dairy product consisting of natural milk constituents or under the Tariff Heading 1704 as a Sugar confectionery? Crux: The product ‘Militry Malai Mithai’ will merit classification under Chapter Heading 2106 90 of the GST Tariff as ‘Sweetmeat’ and would be chargeable to GST at applicable rate under the said tariff entry, presently read with Notification No.01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dtd.28.06.2017 (Sr. No.101 to Schedule I) and corresponding notification under MPGST Act,2017. |
Notification No. 01/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
|
9. |
M/s Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut
Vitaran Company Limited v/s Shri Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 18/09/2018 Issues:- Whether clause(vi)(a) of Sr. No. 3 of table of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017 is applicable on the works contract services received by it and determination of liability to pay Tax? Crux:- The Applicant is not entitled for the benefit of concessional rate of GST @12% (6% under Central tax and 6% State tax) for the said projects in terms of Notification No.24/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 21.09.2017 read with Notification No.31/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017. The applicable rate of tax is 18% (9% under Central tax and 9% State tax. Order Summary |
Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Madhaya Pardesh |
8. |
M/s Jabalpur Entertainment Complexes P.
Ltd. v/s Shri Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 27/08/2018
Issues:-1. Whether GST
@5% can be charged on food, soft drinks, and snacks sold in the Snack
Bar & Food Court in terms of Notification no.46/2017? Crux:- 1. The
items supplied in Snack Bar and Food Court shall be chargeable to GST in
terms of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended
by Notification No.46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) at prevailing rate of
5%(2.5% SGCT and 2.5% CGST), subject to conditions laid down at Serial
Number 7 of the parent Notification classifiable under SAC 9963. |
Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) Section 17 of CGST |
7. |
M/s Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut
Vitaran Company Limited v/s Shri Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 27/08/2018 Issues:- Whether clause(vi)(a) of Sr. No. 3 of table of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017 is applicable on the works contract undertaken by it And determination of liability to pay Tax? Crux:-The Applicant is not entitled for the benefit of concessional rate of GST @12% (6% under Central tax and 6% State tax) for the said projects in terms of Notification No.24/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 21.09.2017 read with Notification No.31/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017. The applicable rate of tax is 18% (9% under Central tax and 9% State tax). Order Summary |
Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Madhaya Pardesh |
6. |
Indian Institute of Management v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 10/08/2018 Issues:- 1. Whether the course – Executive Post Graduate Programme in Management (EPGP), after enactment of Indian Institute of Management Act 2017 notified effective from 31st January 2018, is exempted from Goods and Service Tax? 2. In case of exemption to EPGP, will total amount of fees collected towards EPGP for the academic session 2018-19 is exempted, whether collected before or after enactment of IIM Act 2017 or only amount collected after enactment of IIM Act 2017? Crux:- 1. the Executive Post
Graduate Programme will not be eligible for exemption from GST as the
same has been categorically excluded from exemption under Entry No.67 to
the Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). |
Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Karnataka |
5. |
M/s Ankit Tandon and Enterprises &
Tollways Private Limited v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 09/08/2018 Issue: Whether exemption under Sr. No. 23 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) will apply to services provided by the Applicant, i.e. Service by the way of access to a road or a bridge on payment of access to a road or a bridge on payment of toll charges on subcontract basis?"
Crux: There is no restriction regarding the supplier or the
recipient of the supply in case of providing access to a Road or Bridge
on payment of toll charge. Therefore, even though the supply of the
service to the user of the Toll Road is by the sub-contractor, GST is
not payable on the amount of Toll Charges collected. It is exempted by
Sr. No. 23 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax(Rate). |
|
4. |
Ashok Kumar Patel v/s Shri Rajiv Agrawal, Shri
Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 25/07/2018 Issues:-
Applicability of the notification number F-A-3-08-2018-1-V (43), Dated
24- 4-2018 regarding E- way bill issued under MPGST Act/Rules on
“unmanufactured tobacco” under CTH 2401? |
|
3. |
Arpijay Fabricators Pvt. Ltd. v/s Shri
Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 30/06/2018 Issues:- Classification of supply
of building bodies as supply of goods or supply of services and rate of
tax applicable on it? |
Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
AR of
Hryana AR of Goa
|
2. |
Egis India Consulting Engineers Private
Limited v/s Shri Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 22/06/2018 Issues:- 1. Whether PDMC provided
by Applicant to recipient under the Contract for AMRUT; and PMC under
the Contract for PMAY would qualify as an activity in relation to
function entrusted to Panchayat or Municipality under Article 243G or
Article 243W respectively, of the Constitution of India? |
Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Andhra Pardesh |
1. |
Swati Dubey
v/s Shri Rajiv Agrawal, Shri Manoj kumar Choubey Order Dated 22/06/2018
Issues:-
(i) What is HSN in which the service of
construction of new 33/220 kV Pooling Substation at Badwar, REWA along
with associated 220 kV DCDS Transmission Line and associated feeder bay
work on total Turnkey basis against Bid Identification No.
RUMS/2016-17/372/014 (Lot-I) under World Bank Financing shall fall?
Crux:- The scope of work in all the
three agreements are identical, accordingly, all the three agreements
shall have the same classification. |
Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate)
AR of Rajasthan AR of Maharashtra
AR of Maharashtra
AR of Rajasthan
AR of Karnataka
AR of Uttrakhand
AR of Rajasthan
AR of Andhra Pradesh |